132 [Healing Series] Advocacy

Transcript

Full shownotes: https://www.adopteeson.com/listen/132


Haley Radke: This show is listener-supported. You can join us and help our show grow to support more adoptees by going to Adopteeson.com/partner.

You are listening to Adoptees On, the podcast where adoptees discuss the adoption experience. I'm your host, Haley Radke, and this is a special episode in our Healing Series, where I interview therapists who are also adoptees themselves, so they know from personal experience what it feels like to be an adoptee.

Today we are talking about public activism and advocacy, the costs that's associated with it, how to hold our boundaries. This is such a great conversation. Let's listen in.

I'm so pleased to welcome back to Adoptees On, Melanie Chung-Sherman. Welcome, Melanie.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Hi. Thank you. I'm glad to be here.

Haley Radke: I am so excited we get to talk again because last time we were talking about microaggressions and emotional labor, and there's so many themes about working in advocacy and speaking up publicly about adoption. And you were challenging us on a number of things. I really just want to continue that conversation with you. I see you posting regularly on your public Facebook page, challenges about adoption, different adoption topics, and racism, and all sorts of things. And when I see those things, Melanie, honestly, I'm just like, ‘Whoa, how is she taking on this giant job and replying to the comments and all of that?’ That's a lot. When we talk about emotional labor, that's a lot. You're paying a price. So do you want to talk about that a little bit? What made you decide to challenge us in that way and really pay the price for speaking up publicly?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: It's been an organic process because that's always been part of who I am. In general, I mean, even from elementary school, I would be the person advocating for individuals who may not have had the same access to rights. Like, I remember I even had petitions going on about things that were happening about the teachers.

Haley Radke: You know what, that doesn't even surprise me. That doesn't surprise me in one bit.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Especially growing up in this pretty much all-white community, and this Asian kid was challenging the status quo. Another thing that drew me into social work and into the profession as well, because it just kind of fit, I'm like, ‘Oh, not only is it backed by a code of ethics, but there's a whole group of people, they do that professionally. This is fun! And I get paid for it!’ But more than that, it’s coming from a space, that I would look and I couldn't find the integration of these observations. I couldn't find books, and I couldn't find –particularly when it came to the intersection between mental health work, my years of working in child welfare, from administrative positions, to case management, and then as a therapist– I kept seeing the themes and it would always feel siloed to me. And so even when I post, it would be nothing that I wouldn't share out publicly, verbally, or things that I haven't shared in other circles with individuals.

And again, I think social media has allowed a different kind of platform, but there's also then a dual responsibility. Not only as a licensed social worker where I think about code of ethics and really where my boundaries are professionally, and trying to stay in my lanes, but then also pushing up against what the status quo may be. And I really try to hold a responsibility, not as a provocateur. It really is coming– I've been hearing about this and seeing this for a very long time. Particularly when I'm listening to clients and loved ones. We have a really unique space in our adopted community, because adoption is a salient theme, and that's kind of where it ends. Because so many of us have different lived experiences, so I'm fascinated by the nuances of that.

And then what does that mean within our community and then in the broader community as well? Because so much of my formal education, and just my interest in terms of reading, it really has been then looking at, ‘Well, how has this impacted– How is this policy? How do these historically –the laws, funding, all of these things– all come back to oppression?’ And when we really then dig underneath that, we can start deconstructing even the things within adoption. Because adoption really lives and breathes in the world that, as I was sharing from the last podcast, holds a hierarchy of oppressive power and privilege standards that trickle all the way down.

And so just moving into a space like, ‘Oh gosh, well, the intersectionality within our community is broad and diverse, but it's also pretty thematic. And it's pretty predictable.’ And so learning about that, I'm like, ‘Oh, I can't just keep that in, to myself,’ because these are the things I'm sharing, between colleagues and clients, I'm just curious about. So sometimes it's also a space of going, ‘Huh, I'm gonna put it out into the universe because I don't think I'm the only one who's been thinking about that.’ You know, there's so many other amazing researchers and clinicians, and academics, and activists and advocates who are doing amazing work in our community, adoptee-identified people. And so I also want to give cred to them because their voice also inspires mine and other activists through the years. It comes at a cost, and that's where we have to be really mindful. Because there's times I'm just exhausted by it. But I know that I'm not the only one holding that, and having the supports of other friends, particularly in our community, has really been a life-changer and a lifesaver. Because there's very few, I think, that function in that space. But it's definitely not off-limits to anyone else who chooses to do that. I think that people have to be really mindful of the cost.

Haley Radke: Well, before we go into the cost, yeah, wow, I'm curious because you were saying that you share publicly the things that you have shared in person, with people or at an event when you're speaking. That's what I'm sort of getting from what you said. How did you first decide which pieces of your story were going to be accessible out that chain? So, that you've told in person, or on your Facebook page? Because I think there's a trickle there that can easily get into a waterfall, that you can't take it back. Especially on the internet, right? It's out there, it's out there. So that's peace, like, to make the conscious decision of ‘What part of my story am I going to share and at which level?’ If it's between friends, or public, out there forever, right?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: I think the boundary is really important and I think that it's been actually through mistake and trial and error– So, I started working within adoption almost, I'll age myself, about 20 years ago. And I was young, I was naive, and I was not out of the fog, per se. And so I had overshared quite a bit at the behest– and also the pleasure. I would get the affirmations and accolades from agencies. I was the quote-unquote “good adoptee”. And it wasn't until I went to grad school back from MSW, and then started working at Child Protective Services out of Dallas, I was an investigator for a number of years, and it changed my narrative. It changed my life. And so the things that I wish I could retract now. The internet wasn't as prolific as it is now. I do see that sometimes, particularly with those who are just moving into the space where they're finding their voice. So I'm also thankful it wasn't as prolific, the internet.

But at the same time, the decision consciously now, that what I would share online is the same thing that I would share in person, and that I stand by, or that I've written, or I've had materials published, things that– I can literally stand in front of my children, and hold that narrative with both pride and –it doesn't have to be in this beautiful, perfect package– also in a real, honest and authentic space. Through a lot of private work, through my own therapy and through the support of loved ones and chosen family, I can now share this out in a much more constructive and also, I think, integrated way, that ‘Yeah, this is a truth and this is a part of my life.’

But it's also then, underneath that, undergirding that, there's a message of, ‘In what ways will we bend the walls?’ I really try to be conscious that the things that are shared out that are personal, it's not so centered on my own experience or voice. As in: ‘Because Melanie's a Korean adoptee and she says this, it must be for all.’ No, no. I really want people then to think on a much more dynamic and complex level, and then kind of see where that goes. And I'm mindful when I share that out, whether I'm speaking in front of an audience or I'm speaking just one-on-one.

So I think that's really important: finding the balance between what you want to share out personally to get a point across, that doesn't lend itself where you begin to lose that part of your own story and identity authentically; that it is my authentic parts that I've done a lot of work on, so I can share it out, not because of the things that happen that I have to. And that's why I draw a line, particularly when people ask really personal questions, particularly if they're asking about my background, or like my [unclear: sounds like “adopt”; could be “adult” or “adoptive”] family. Or I'm very private when it comes to my children: “Not at all. That is their narrative.” And I think for adoptees, most of us are really attuned to the protection and privacy of that, that ‘My storylines are mine’. And I have to be responsible and own that: of what comes in and then also how it goes out. But that's come through a lot of mishap and mistake, naivety, impetuousness. Like, there was this space of, like, ‘I gotta share it. People have to know.’

Haley Radke: Well, one of the things you said actually in our last episode when we were talking about microaggressions, you mentioned that it can be, I think the word you used was “intoxicating” in the beginning. Can you talk a little bit about that?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Absolutely. When your story is validated, and it becomes real– at least for myself coming out of the fog, I was thinking I was all alone in this. And then I had a tremendous privilege and opportunity to hold these spaces in terms of training, and speaking at conferences, and doing all these other events in adoption. It can be very intoxicating, and it was. I would get the immediate validation or feedback or “You know so much about adoption, and you do all these things!”-- to a point, and then it becomes toxic. Because without really sitting back and A) taking care of self and B), really being then held accountable– My other loved ones would be like, “You know, I just, I noticed these things that–” It was loved ones, it was also friends within the adopted community, close friends who would come back and say, “When you're sharing this out, I just have a question about that.” And so actually, not in terms of confrontation, but in terms of love and kindness, to go, “When you share that, I have questions about that. What is the motivation behind that?”

So I've been really privileged in my life. I don't want a lot of “yes” people. I want people who are going to challenge what that's going to be and look like, and hold us to a really high standard when we have these platforms. We have to –when we have the privilege to do that within our own community, but particularly out in the broad community– we have tremendous responsibility of what we do with our words, with our actions, with our story. Because I'm also thinking now as a parent. Whatever I put out there and how I share this, the legacy of adoption, and the legacy of how this gets downloaded, also impacts generations that follow. Because it's out there on the internet. This will be out there. And so I really hold that as well, to try to balance what we say and do.

Haley Radke: I appreciate that, yeah. I appreciate you saying that.

You used that word “cost”. “There's a cost to this.” How much does it cost you? No, tell us a little bit what you mean by that, because I think we probably have an idea, but maybe not the whole picture.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: I'll say this, it's one thing when I could talk about safe topics like attachment and trauma, and really kind-of pushing back related to the pathology, especially with adoptees and labeling and names. It was another thing when I started talking about integrating race and racism, and sexuality and identity. That was almost a line for many. I lost friends, people I thought were friends. And I've also lost speaking gigs. I've lost credibility in some circles.

At one point it was intoxicating, those spaces within adoption communities where I could get out and be this platform or voice, as that adoptee that seemed to have it all together. And now, “You're talking about oppression? We can't talk about that. You just stay in your lane and do this.” So the cost has been emotional, it's been mental, it's been physical. It's come at a physical cost as well, where I've got to be really mindful, and I'm very protective of my time and energy because that can quickly get away from –myself at least, but I've seen that particularly in our community, of just doing, doing, doing, and not sitting in the space of discomfort, not sitting in the loss. Because that cost has been loss. And I don't know about you, but I, for myself, I don't like loss. I don't like complicated grief!

Haley Radke: Have we had enough loss? Have we had enough? Come on!

Melanie Chung-Sherman: It’s been a lot. And so when we speak about these complex subjects, it comes at a cost of relationship, and that is what I've grieved the most. That's times that I'm scared the most, of things that I want to say or put in writing, and then I'll delete it or I'll hold it. And many of those, even posting or even talking through it, I'll practice it out with someone else, for accountability. Because, ‘Am I in an energy, am I in a healthy space?’ that I can handle the pushback, and I can possibly even handle interpersonal connection that's going to be challenged. That's been hard. That's been really hard.

Haley Radke: Do you have any thoughts on this, maybe talking to an adoptee who has been online a little bit, kind-of putting their toe in the advocacy space and speaking up here and there. Do you have any words of wisdom for someone like that, and maybe challenges to those of us who have been in it for a while, but maybe our boundaries aren't quite firmed up yet? Thoughts on that?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: I think for those who are just starting, having a really good confluence of friends and peers and loved ones who can really not only love and support you, but also hold the words, not in a space of pushback, but accountability. If you have others with lived experience, you can really speak into that. One of the things that has been a life saver has been mentorship, really seeking out mentorship for those who have gone before. And that’s been everything, just hearing from others who have been in the roles of activism and advocacy, particularly in our communities. And sometimes that's hard, because at least for Korean adoptees, the first wave started a couple decades ago, but it really started taking off in the nineties. So it's been harder to find other mentors outside of a generational lived experience. But there are many, so I look at that in awe. And I also seek out counsel and wisdom. And we don’t have to agree –I'm not asking for agreement in all things, because that's pretty boring– but I think, a consensus of just mutual respect and wisdom. So those who are just starting, find other people that you feel like, ‘I wanna sit at their feet and just know.’ I've had amazing mentors, particularly women of color, who've been doing this work and can really just, “Sit down. You're gonna be tired. How are you taking care of yourself?” Like, “In what ways are you protecting your family? Are you protecting your voice?” Because even in this –we've talked about loss– I have to share that I've also gained amazing friendships, and amazing allyships, and those who are accomplices, in ways that I know if I stayed in the same space a couple years ago, I would've never been exposed to those with this hunger and passion– of all legs of the triad and outside in the community. And so that has been remarkable. So even if it comes at a cost, there are also great gains and we've gotta find that balance.

And for those who are doing this who are tenured, or battle-worn, we talked about the self-compassion and taking care of self, but then also constantly learning. And I think also then opening up, always giving the credit to those who've come before. And I think that's really, at least for myself, that's really important that we are giving voice to so many different perspectives. We can all learn and grow, and integrate new kinds of ideas and materials. I think because, not just as a transracial adoptee, but our narrative as adoptive people, we can move and navigate into a lot of different spaces and really sit in spaces –that many other people may find uncomfortable or unknown to them– in a really genuine way. And I think that opens up a lot of opportunity to really get to know someone else's story outside of our own without defense, really just sitting there. And that's what I encourage for all of us to do. I have to remind myself to do that cuz we can get really entrenched and ‘It's gotta be this way. I've been working so hard! I can't believe they're saying that! This is, oh–!’ and get really defensive. And I think that's also coming from, at least for myself, my own lived experience of: I'm waiting for the microaggression or I'm waiting for them to aggress, versus: I'm sitting here and I'm listening and then I'm going to take that in.

And then continuing to build healthy boundaries for yourself. It's okay to say no.

Haley Radke: Oh, yes. Love that one! The one other thought I wanted to share, you kind-of triggered this for me right at the beginning of this conversation, was just talking about how there are other people doing the same work. I'm reminded that when we do need to take that pause and kind of step back and just be like, ‘I just need to peace out for a minute,’ that the others fill the gap for us, right? And vice versa. When someone else is on their social media break, others will step in. So it's not all on your two shoulders.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Oh, it's too much. And I think that's part of the healthy boundaries. And here's the thing, there's no monopoly on need. That's really a psychotic idea, like, ‘Without my voice–!’ There is no monopoly on that. It's there, we got it.

Haley Radke: That's the twist on “there's room at the table for everyone,” because there's no monopoly on need, that's so good.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: You'll find where your voice is valued, and then remind yourself of the value of your voice. And part of that is also rest and rejuvenation, restoration, as much as it is in engaging. And then holding whatever balance that you need to take care of. Because right now I'm on a social meeds cleanse and it feels good. I'm just holding multiple things and it's okay. You're like, ‘Okay!’ I really respect when people do that. And it's more than social meeds cleanse, it's, like, cleanse on books and the things that I am literally digesting on a daily basis. And really being mindful, not shutting out the world and not pretending it doesn't exist. The more work that we do, particularly in advocacy and activism, I was sharing with you before, it's in the forefront of my mind, and the drumbeat in the background. And sometimes I have to remember it's okay if it goes in the drumbeat, in the background, so I can be present for the things that I love and the people I love. Because when I can do that, I can fill myself up and be ready for the next thing, and invite that.

Haley Radke: I love that. Thank you. That was a perfect note to wrap up on. Thank you so much, Melanie, for your wisdom in this area.

I'm assuming when this gets posted, you'll be off that social media cleanse, so where can we connect with you online?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: I may be back by then!

Haley Radke: You'll be back, you'll be back!

Melanie Chung-Sherman: You can find me on Facebook on Melanie Chung-Sherman, LCSW, PLLC. You can just Google that, and that's my professional page. Also, mcscounsel.com is my website, and then Instagram, @mcscounsel. And I'm not as ‘on’ on Instagram. I'm pretty specific in where I'm going to share out, and where I have the bandwidth lately.

Haley Radke: I've learned so much from the conversations Melanie is having over on her Facebook page, so make sure you're following her there. That's my extra plug for that.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Thanks.

Haley Radke: Thank you so much. It's been a pleasure.

Oh my goodness. So much good information from Melanie. I just value her insights so, so much, and I hope that you will re-listen to this episode. I don't say that every time we have a therapist on the show –I do a lot of the times, I feel like, in the Healing Series– but this week's and last week's, especially, I think Melanie hits on so many very deeply important topics. It can be easy for our brains to just kind-of scoot on past those points and go on to the next thing she's talking about, but I think there's a lot of things here that would be really helpful to revisit, for myself personally. And, you know, we're in this new year, 2020. Maybe you've thought about, ‘I don't know, maybe it's the year that I'm gonna make my first therapist appointment. Maybe I'm going to actually look at this adoption stuff a little deeper. Maybe I am going to join up with a state that's looking at changing some laws about adoptee access to original birth certificates…’ I don't know, maybe you've got some big plans going on. I challenge you, don't let this stuff settle down to the bottom of life.

It's easy for busy work and taking care of your family or friends, or just you doing whatever, going to work, whatever you do on the daily, it's very easy to let these deep things kind of just set at the bottom and to just let them go by. But just, can I challenge you? Don't do that. If 2020 is your year to take care of yourself, to actually look at doing some activism or advocacy or whatever that looks like for you, don't let these things that you hear from amazing experts every week, don't let that just settle to the bottom and don't do anything about it. Maybe it's the time to re-listen and take some notes and think, ‘Okay, what is my next step here?’ And I would encourage you to find an adoptee adoption-competent therapist if you have the financial means to do so. That's some of the best money I've spent, truly, in my healing journey.

So anyway, thank you so much for listening. I want to thank my monthly supporters: without you, this show would not continue to exist. There are some fun new things, new changes, new things happening over on Patreon, so I will be telling you about that coming up soon. If you want to partner with me monthly, Adopteeson.com/partner helps keep the show going. And I appreciate so many of you who have signed up and said, “Yes, I think Adoptees On is important and I want it to continue to exist in this world.” So thank you so much for that. Thanks again for listening, and let's talk again next Friday.

131 [Healing Series] Microaggressions

Transcript

Full shownotes: https://www.adopteeson.com/listen/131


Haley Radke: This show is listener-supported. You can join us and help our show grow to support more adoptees by going to Adopteeson.com/partner.

You are listening to Adoptees On, the podcast where adoptees discuss the adoption experience. I'm your host, Haley Radke, and this is a special episode in our Healing Series, where I interview therapists who are also adoptees themselves, so they know from personal experience what it feels like to be an adoptee. Today we are talking about microaggressions. Oh my goodness, this is so interesting. Okay, let's listen in.

I am so pleased to welcome to Adoptees On, Melanie Chung-Sherman. Welcome, Melanie.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Thank you. I'm so excited to be on. I've been following your work.

Haley Radke: Aw, thank you. I'm so, so joyful to have you on the show today. I can't believe it's your first time on. I already said this is embarrassing to me that you haven't been on before, so welcome. And since it is your first time, would you mind just sharing a little bit about your story with us so we can kind-of get to know you a little bit?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Right. Well, I am a transracial, international adoptee and one of the end of the first wave of Korean adoptees. I was adopted in the late 70s and placed in the land of gazillion adoptees in Minneapolis, MN, and my adoptive family moved my brother and I and my youngest brother down to Texas, my youngest brother being biologically born to my parents and my younger brother is also KAD –Korean adoptee– as well. So I was raised in pretty much the Deep South, outside of Fort Worth, TX, and have really established my roots and wings there, out of all places. Where I feel both at home, and then sometimes as foreign or international or– just in terms of my own lived experiences, I’m walking in the world holding a lot of different identities, particularly as a woman of color, an immigrant, and a transracial adoptee in the South. And that's really framed the work that I do today, and the work that I do within the adoption community, and advocacy outside the adoption community with more marginalized populations.

Haley Radke: Yeah, that's got to be a varied experience you've had there, to say the least. Can you just tell us, just briefly, how you decided to go into social work and then into therapy, and just a little bit about your work in that area?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: I think like for many –I definitely cannot speak for all– I really look at the numbers of adoptive people who enter into the field, helping professions specifically. And I don't believe that I'm any more unique than the rest, who are doing some amazing and challenging work specifically in social work, mental health, and helping professions.

From a really young age, I knew that I wanted to be able to lift up others in a way that was unique to the stories and the lived experiences that my brother and I had. We grew up pretty much in total whiteness. Just to give some context, the high school that both my brother and I graduated from still had the Confederate flag. We sang “The Spirit of Dixie” in every homecoming, every football game, and it was indoctrinated and normalized. It really wasn't until I moved out of that space that I really began to realize just how impactful that was, particularly within an experience as trying to fit into a community there, and then at the same time trying to really build identity. Nothing mirrored that experience. In a lot of ways we had to align within the community, and even then, at a young age, I still felt it was incongruent, but I didn't have the words to say what it was, nor did I have anyone to really mirror back about how obtuse it was and how strange and odd it was for kids of color, particularly Asian kids, to be in these spaces.

As a social worker, I got really involved when I started working in the adoption field, and that was really the catalyst into learning more about the social work profession. But my undergrad was actually in theater. I finished at Texas Wesleyan University with a bachelor's in theater arts, which I always say is the most expensive therapy that I'm still paying off. In terms of identity formation and deconstruction, I could be all these things, and I didn't have to be parts of myself, and yet I found a lot of myself in that. And I think that's also given me a space to be much more comfortable in other people's difficult narratives.

So I could try on all these characters and storylines, but was always drawn to loss. I was always drawn to characters that didn't fit within the box. It really was other adoptees, as I moved into mid-adulthood –it really wasn't until my late 20s and my early 30s, that I really started establishing friendships within the adoption community, particularly in the Korean adoptee community– that I started putting the pieces together: ‘Oh, that's why I've been doing this.’

And social work just fit. I fell in love with NASW's code of ethics and the values, social justice being at the core of our six values that we hold. The dignity and worth of a human being. The importance of human relationships. I mean, all this spoke to the very fundamental parts of myself that didn't always align with the spaces that I grew up in or the spaces I existed in.

I think I've always been comfortable in tension. I think most adoptees are. Within ourselves, I think there is this space that we can really hold the complexities of the narratives between things that are congruent and make sense, and things that don't. And I know that social work, and learning about other people's stories and holding that with great esteem, privilege, and respect as I hear –particularly from those whose voices don't always get heard– is really exciting. It's challenging and hard at times. It's heartbreaking at times, but yet it's humanizing. So I was drawn into the profession and, yeah, here I am. I love it.

Haley Radke: That's beautiful and it's also heartbreaking, right? And you talking about liking to be in the conf– not conflict, but in the challenging spot. Whew! In the tension? Yikes! That makes me uncomfortable. Okay. I feel like I don't fit there. But yeah, we do. We do live in that space a lot of the time.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: And yet you have this platform and it is! That's an exciting part of our experience, I think.

Haley Radke: Yes, well, I notice you challenging people regularly over social media and calling to our attention some of these really deeply seated things and really pushing us to look deeper at so many different issues. Which is so admirable, and as I just said, that makes me really uncomfortable a lot of the time.

But a lot of adoptees, we're navigating these microaggressions constantly and some of us don't even realize it. We are going to focus in on talking about microaggressions today, but can you tell us what is a microaggression, and just put your adoptee slant on it because a lot of us, we might have heard that term before, but not necessarily know what it means or how it would apply to our own lives.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Right. How I describe it, particularly when I'm working with clients, particularly adoptees who are clients, is it feels like a death by a million paper cuts. These are comments or statements that may not have the intention of being pejorative or may not have the intention of being negative in the impact, but they can be othering, and they can feel marginalizing. They feel heavy. And they feel like there's something within the very core of my identity that someone has made a pretty flippant statement.

So it really is stereotypes come alive in small to large actions, or comments or dismissals. You know, the microaggressions, particularly towards adoptees, the things that we've heard: “You should be so grateful that you're adopted.” Well, it's very loaded and it's silencing too, so it shuts down deeper dialogue because automatically there is this visceral sense when it's happening. I myself still get flabbergasted. There is that part of me, that young part of myself that will always be there, the pleaser part, the ‘don't leave me’ part. The ‘I don't wanna be rejected’ part. And yet also the advocate and the fighter: ‘I've worked really hard to get to this space, to utilize’ voice, and ‘I know what's happening here’.

Microaggressions can be based on any part of our identity, but I think particularly as adoptees, we really hold, for so long– I think one of the most challenging parts of –for many, not all, but for many– we'll call it ‘coming out of the fog’, is actually deconstructing the denial, deconstructing the statements that we've heard throughout our lives. I've had to deny parts of how incongruent or how disconcerting that was internally for myself, and put that into another context to go, ‘Wow, that was actually harmful,’ or ‘That was hurtful,’ or, ‘And that's not in my mind’. And so I think sometimes microaggressions in a lot of ways can also be a form of psychological gaslighting.

So it's, “You look like your parents must have done a really great job!” and “You really look like you've got it all together!” Kind-of that ‘good adoptee’ modeling and that reinforcement. Or “Aren't you glad that you're not an orphan? Because can you imagine what your life would've been like?” And so it's these automatic assumptions that sometimes can be microaggressive, but if it's a millionth time, it can be full-on aggressive.

Then, that paradox between, ‘I don't want to be the angry adoptee–’ that pejorative, which is really gaslighting, that's really silencing. Whenever I hear an adjective before an identity, I'm like, ‘Ooh, that's a big red flag.’ Because it is another form of silencing, othering for the benefit of those in spaces of power and privilege. And when we really deconstruct adoption, at the core of that, it really is a power and privilege dynamics, and oppression dynamics, and that is the things that are unspoken. We are not socialized to talk about it. We are not prepared to go there, even on a verbal level, much less to integrate that into the emotional parts of our psyche. If we've grown up in denial, like, “You are just like everybody else in the family!”, and now, especially as a transracial adoptee, I'm like, ‘No, I know full well there's a whole other part of my identity or story.’ I may not have the words for it, but I think particularly when these things happen on a developmental plane, when you've grown up with it, when it's become part of your own vernacular, internally, it is very hard to extricate externally. And that's what makes it– it can be quite exhausting. And so when adoptees, when many begin to regain the voice– and I don't even think it is like I'm regaining this new voice. It's like I've watched with awe and curiosity because it's something that's familiar to myself as well, it's the integration of what's always been there: that infant part, or the toddler part, or the multiple homes that I've been in, or the multiple placements. For someone to sit down and say, “Yeah, that happened to you, and there's some words for it,” I think that's a power within many adoptee spaces, is the affirmation, the validation, absent of full-on microaggressions.

And also being then aware of the intersectionality of microaggressions that can live and breathe within our own community, that different types of microaggressions, or the historical underpinnings of that, they are different. And I think that is just as we contextualize and get even deeper into our own sense of our voice and self –this could be anything from sexuality and the integration of racial difference, even within our own community; gender identity and expression– that there is a platform of understanding what microaggressions and othering is. I think that's a space to start with, and then going even deeper underneath that, where we can really look at what is inclusivity and ‘giving’ voice.

And I think that's hard. I've watched it, or at least experienced it, within portions of our own adopted community. Because, gosh, when my voice has been compartmentalized and dismissed in silence, when I finally get to these spaces and I can do that, there is this part for myself, I have to be really mindful of how that downloads, how that looks, how that may feel for somebody else, whether they're just beginning their journey or whether they've been doing advocacy, activism and different types of work for a long time. I don't think we're ever really there. I think we can just continue to build on each experience.

Haley Radke: So having this lens now that we're like, okay, I think we could recognize when someone says something to us, and it's a microaggression, when you come to a point of strength and you think, ‘You know what? I think I'm gonna push back on this a little bit,’ how would you respond to someone –or would you?– to correct them?

You were listing off some of the examples, and one thing I hear from so many adoptees, especially if they maybe are telling their reunion story, for example, the first question they'll get is something like, “Oh, well, what do your real parents think about that?” What would be a response that you could give to something like that?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: I think it is so individualized and one of the things that I've found, like in terms of our lexicon, almost this space, like, I've never really interacted with other groups of identified people where we have to validate family members before we can validate our experience. Does that make sense? Like, “I had a really great– I love my parents! I love this!” I've never been to other professional conferences where I've had to share out– or expect that maybe the keynote or other speakers who hold different identities, that they open with, “I had a really great childhood!”

Haley Radke: Right! So, I love that you're pointing that out because one thing that we saw last year was the Red Table Talk when Angela Tucker was on, and I mean, let's not go down too far down that rabbit trail, but just the fact that, “Oh, and her parents are here!” Like, what other conversation would they have with someone where they're like, “Oh, let's talk about this topic, and let's see what your mom and dad have to say about it!”, right?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: Right, right. In psychotherapy, I’ve not gone to a conference where we're talking about neurobiology and attachment indices, and the speaker or the researcher is now referencing their parents in particular, or that the expectation is that they do, in order to legitimize their own body of knowledge and research and experience. And so I hold that when we get those questions, I think it's okay to pause. I think it's okay then, even in this space of just being curious, many times I'll just ask: “I'm curious what you mean underneath the question?” and I'll just wait. Because I think then there is this onus, in terms of our own sense of our own dignity, our own energy, and our own space of integrity as adopted people to be able to hold– I get to hold the floor. I think being able to take that pause and step back and go, ‘Huh, what am I feeling here?’ For myself, I always consider that, and then actually turning the question, in terms of emotional labor. I mean, it's laborious to continue to do advocacy work where we are constantly sharing out, literally, parts of something so private, so personal, without, really, the respect response, the bidirectional response, just in terms of being able to be seen by other individuals. I think it's okay for us, or at least for myself, to take that pause, ‘Now, I'm wondering what they're actually asking.’ Even though I also know, underneath, this is the millionth time this has happened. We get asked these questions. It also then, it's not a dereliction of our own sense of our voice, but I do think that it places the onus on the asker.

We are constantly –adoptee; askee; panelist; all these different things– we’re kind-of put up on this stage or these platforms, to not only share out, but then also conversely share so much detailed information, that f the asker hasn't even done their work to metabolize it, I kind of weigh the question itself: ‘Do I even wanna engage in this?’ Because how much do we have the responsibility to constantly teach and train? Social media, particularly for those who've had more marginalized platforms or voices –not as victim spaces, but really as we weren't getting published– we can look historically at the research and the literature for decades, who held the narrative. And being able to, in those spaces, for adoptees as well, to go back and look at where we've come from, what's out there. And as much as I have a responsibility, if I accept a position where I'm speaking out, or speaking into a subject that's related to adoption, I've done my work. And I fully recognize that not everybody is going to be on the same page or in that space, but I do ask if I'm asked to do, let's say, a training or a keynote on transracial adoptions specifically, I've really now embedded into my ask-back, “What is your organization doing to support and actually to elevate the voices of adoptees, elevate the voices of people of color, elevate the voices of our LGBTQ community? And in what ways after I leave here will you do that? And in what ways before I come are you going to prepare for that?” So it's really not a bookend. You know, that adoption by the voices of adoptees isn't like, “Oh, we'll just do this…” It’s almost– it's patronizing. If you really want my voice, then please honor when I'm giving you resources. Use these resources because I know I'm able to do this work because of great sacrifices made by other adoptees who have really had to go through tremendous challenges just to even hold space, and I always want to honor that.

And so even before answering some questions, sometimes I may ask, “I'm curious–” I'll ask an audience, “What works have you digested? What works are you interested in?” Because I'm not speaking for all adopted people. That's a dangerous platform to be in. I can speak from a lived experience and through collectively, professionally, what themes are coming up within the work that's being done. But, “What else have you done?” as well. And I think then making a decision. ‘Do I want to teach here? Do I have the bandwidth?’ And I think for adoptees we need to learn how to take really good care of ourselves, value that space.

Haley Radke: I appreciate that challenge, truthfully, because I think, yeah, I'm kind of hoping for, like, the magic answer you can give when someone gives you one more paper cut.

But I love that idea of thinking about, ‘Okay. What is this really gonna serve in the long run? If I don't say something, or if I do…’ and really our self-care is really paramount.

Melanie Chung-Sherman: I think the self-compassion piece –I appreciate Dr. Kristen Neffs work on self-compassion– is paramount in a lot of the work I do, in terms of integrating and speaking into experiences, particularly when I'm working with clients who identify as adoptees.

We can really move into spaces quite quickly in terms of over-functionality, perfectionism. And it really is coming from genuine, visceral spaces and experiences that we've had. And so particularly when we move into the realms of advocacy and activism related to any kind of platform in adoption, the personal is political. The political is personal. The policies, initiatives… and then coupled with microaggressions, because those who hold space in terms of power and privilege– the dynamics have already been there for generations, they've been there for decades. And so holding self-compassion of, ‘When do I choose to bend the walls today? And when do I choose to take–’ it's not taking necessarily a step back, but a breath in. To be like, ‘You know what, I have done what I need to do in terms of the work.’ And if I'm doing that work, then part of that's going to entail really having a good therapist –I'm all about that, especially as a mental health professional– but then, even for myself, to be able to come back to someone with objectivity to really help center and actually just kind-of deconstruct and get in there and really talk through ‘What is my motivation for being here? What still fills me up? What helps keep me going? And what are the things right now, if I were to write these down and I were to name them out, the things that are exhausting me, the things that have been harmful?’

Because when we work in spaces where oppression and power dynamics are significant, I worry about individuals who say, “I'm not tired. I can do this all day long. None of it bothers me.’ Even that self-defense, what is that girding up in the spaces that are the most vulnerable? In the spaces that for many, at least for myself, it's hard to be vulnerable. Because vulnerability can also lead to abandonment ,and vulnerability is scary, and it's an unknown quantity. I, myself, I'm great at, like, I want control, I want predictability. I need to know what's here. Like, even before we came on, I knew that I had to have water, and coffee, or some kind of liquid. So all my close friends and colleagues know that it's a safety mechanism for myself, but it's also a compassion space of, like, ‘I know what I need,’ to take care of myself before I do.

But as we're talking about self-compassion, I think it's really important for adoptees in particular to really know what their limitation is. And I think that's hard when you're really beginning to put your voice out there and people are listening and you're getting feedback. It can be really addictive, it can be intoxicating. It can also be quite energy-draining. You know, Brené Brown talks about the “vulnerability hangover”, and I know whenever I speak specifically in spaces for adoption, I'm gonna need a good 24 hours of, like, a ‘social meeds’ cleanse, and a cleanse, like, in general, and really being with, ‘Who are the people that love me and support me? What are the things that bring me beauty and comfort?’ and when I have the energy and the time and space, then you know, ‘At what point do I wanna engage, and then at what point am I going to kind-of hold back a little bit?’

Haley Radke: Thank you so much for sharing that. I want to pause you because I think we are gonna talk more about this in our next episode. Thank you so much, Melanie. I really appreciate your thoughts on that and I think there's a lot of learning for us to do here. So I'm going to challenge people to take a few minutes and really think about what Melanie shared with us. In that, where can we connect with you online?

Melanie Chung-Sherman: So my website is mcscounsel.com, and you can also connect with me on Instagram @mcscounsel. And you can also connect through my professional Facebook page, you can just type in “Melanie Chung-Sherman, LCSW, PLLC,” and that will pull up the professional Facebook page.

Haley Radke: Wonderful. Thank you so much.

Wow. Did that give you enough to ponder for, I mean, days and days and days? I think this is an episode that bears re-listening to, and I truly think there's so many pieces of the real, deep story of adoption that takes layers and layers of understanding. And Melanie hit on so many high points, so many. So I really think if you give this episode a re-listen, you're going to hear something different, probably the next, I don't know, 10 times you hear it. And this is a great place where we can have conversations like this is over in the Adoptees On Patreon group. I have monthly supporters of the show, if you want to join them, Adoptees on.com/partner, and we have several levels of benefits. One is a weekly podcast that's called Adoptees Off-Script. One is an adoptees-only Facebook group, and we have a lot of really good conversations in there. So those are some of the benefits to supporting the show, and plus then the show gets to continue and live in this world and help other adoptees.

So thanks for considering that. I really appreciate it. Adopteeson.com/partner if you want to join us, and if you want to say with your money that Adoptees On is important and you want it to keep existing with that.

Ooh, I'm so excited. Melanie's going to be back next week, so make sure you're subscribed so you don't miss our conversation next week.

Thanks so much for listening, let's talk again next Friday.

126 [Healing Series] Surviving the Holidays

Transcript

Full shownotes: https://www.adopteeson.com/listen/126


Haley Radke: This show is listener supported. You can join us and help our show grow to support more adoptees by going to adopteeson.com/partner.

You are listening to Adoptees On, the podcast where adoptees discuss the adoption experience. I'm your host, Haley Radke, and this is a special episode in our healing series, where I interview therapists who are also adoptees themselves so they know from personal experience what it feels like to be an adoptee.

Today, we are taking your questions about surviving the holidays. Let's listen in.

I'm so pleased to welcome back to Adoptees On, Lesli Johnson. Hi, Lesli.

Lesli A. Johnson: Hi, Haley. Glad to be here, as always.

Haley Radke: Oh my gosh, so good. I love talking with you. You're so wise, and give us such good advice. So excited. I realized that our last “Surviving the Holidays,” (our very first episode together) was three years ago. So it's time to give it a refresh, hey?

Lesli A. Johnson: Okay, let's do it. I can't believe it's–that was that long ago, but I trust your math.

Haley Radke: I double checked on the website: 2016. So you gave us some really great tips, and I have reposted that episode multiple times. And I've even heard (I don't know if you know this), a couple of different support groups have played it at their meetings, and discussed your techniques and given their members extras. Oh, yeah.

Lesli A. Johnson: Wow! That's wonderful. I'm so glad to do that.

Haley Radke: It's so great. So, let's talk about it. Navigating the holidays as an adopted person…I mean, holidays are stressful for everybody anyway, right? There's all these expectations. There's all this stuff to do. Your calendar gets full. You've got, maybe, multiple commitments and all the things. So it's not–I mean, it's a big deal.

Lesli A. Johnson: It's a big deal. Yeah. I think it's a stressful time for many people, and I think you hit one of the keywords: expectations. So I always tell my clients, kind of approach the holidays with–maybe you can lower your expectations.

Because it's a set kind of a setup, I think, for disaster sometimes, if we have these expectations that everything is going to be perfect, or going into it expecting everything's going to be horrible. Maybe a better way might just be to expect that it's going to be however it is, and really embracing some self-care techniques and ways of working with…activate triggers or activations in the moment. Sort of prepping yourself and having a toolbox of stuff to pull from.

Haley Radke: I love that. Okay, let's start with that. What are just a couple things that we should just have in our toolkit, ready to go if we know that something's gonna be a challenging event?

Lesli A. Johnson: Okay. Well, I think the one thing (this isn't necessarily a tool)--but it's the acknowledgement that when we go back into our families that we grew up with, oftentimes we're immediately catapulted back into that role that we were in our family.

And our other family members treat us like the little sister, or the little girl who didn't have good table manners. And so if we can recognize that we might be doing our work all through the year, our extended family members may not. So again, I think it's about adjusting expectations in terms of practical tools.

You know, I think we talked about this, I guess three years ago (like you said), but just giving ourselves permission to remove ourselves from situations that are uncomfortable. I think as adopted people, a lot of times we had to kind of go along, and I think as adults we, it's okay to say, "Excuse me for a minute." And take a walk.

Or if you're sitting at the table and get activated, do some real grounding techniques: feeling your back against the chair and feeling your feet on the ground, just to kind of get back into your body.

Haley Radke: All right. I think we should dive into some questions from listeners.

So Lesli and I both asked on our social media, if you had questions about surviving the holidays and we got so many questions. It's quite the deal, so we are gonna get to as many as we can.

Now the first one is actually–I thought we would start here because so many of us, even just thinking about this, we're like thinking, Okay, we're juggling our families and maybe we're half juggling bio or adoptive. But I want to start here, because there are a lot of adopted people who have not connected with biological family, or are estranged from biological family, or their adoptive family–either by choice or they have been disowned for searching.

I mean, there is a huge amount of adopted people who are just on their own and they don't have that extended family, either bio or adopted.

So one of the questions we got was, "Am I wrong for not even being around any of my bio or adoptive families during the holidays?" Can you just talk to us about surviving the holidays if you are not connected to family? That can be really challenging and bring up a lot of feelings for someone.

Lesli A. Johnson: Sure. I think that's a really good point, is that a lot of times people don't have family to spend holidays with, and so what can they do in terms of taking care of themselves? Are there friends that they can connect with? Can they do something special for themselves? So I think, again, it's that self-care so that they don't have to maybe be by themselves.

Or alternatively, I know some people who actually use the holiday periods to do things on their own; that they really don't want to be around other people. And that's okay. It's–I think, again, giving yourself permission to do what feels good for you.

And if it doesn't feel good, if you're–if there's loneliness or anxiety, really checking in and seeing what might help with that. It might be that it's spending time with friends rather than family.

Haley Radke: I've also heard from a couple of people that have challenges with the holidays, that they will plan a trip to just get out of there, right? Like they will not just do stuff on their own (in their own city), but they will take a trip somewhere and go to a nice, warm place and they can think about other things rather than having maybe some of those familiar reminders of staying at home.

Lesli A. Johnson: Right, right. Yeah. I think about tradition and people… I think there's sometimes an expectation that generations have to carry on traditions. And I think there could be some intentionality there–picking and choosing what intentions the person wants to carry on and which ones they…

If they want to start a new tradition, and that might be taking a trip over the holidays. That's, personally, what my tradition is now with my partner. He does not care for the holidays for his own reasons. And so we do go away. We go away for a bit between over Christmas and New Year's.

And that has become our tradition and certainly our family members. Some of them were disappointed, but you know, that's okay. It's okay. I don't–I mean, this sounds sarcastic and I don't mean it to be, but nobody's ever (that I know of) has ever died from disappointment.

And, again, if (and I don't mean that sarcastically), although it sounds bad. It's just–it's okay to talk with our family members and explain why we're not gonna attend, that we're not comfortable, or that we're creating new traditions. And it's okay. It's okay to do that.

Haley Radke: Well, okay, so one of the questions is "Is it really okay to skip or change traditions for the sake of my mental health?" So yes, you're saying it's okay.

Lesli A. Johnson: I think it is okay. And I think others would agree. That's not to say that it's easy and it's not to say that people who are changing their families' traditions aren't gonna be met with unfavorable responses.

And again, it's okay. It's not about convincing other people to agree. It's just about stating with you and using "I" statements: "I'm not gonna be able to attend this year because I've made other plans," or "I'm not gonna be able to come to Christmas Eve because Uncle Joe repeatedly makes me uncomfortable."

Whatever the "I" statements are, but that it's not about convincing other people to agree. It's more about just being able to talk about our boundaries and limitations.

Haley Radke: All right. Let's talk about those conversations a little bit more. Here's a question: "I haven't told my adoptive parents that I'm spending Thanksgiving with the other side (which I think they're meaning their biological family). How do I be tactful and objective when maintaining boundaries rather than being defensive?"

Lesli A. Johnson: Hmm. That is a lot of question in that question, and I can't tell from the person if they actually want to share that they're gonna be spending Thanksgiving with the other side (presumably their biological family), or not.

But again, I think it's important to keep in mind that many adoptees have grown up in families where they had to do a lot of work to protect their adoptive parents. That they've been kind of conditioned to be the good kid, the good adoptive adoptee. And maybe for this person, that's asking that question, it's an opportunity to have a real honest conversation with their adoptive parents.

And again, the question wasn't completely specific, but I think that, just considering that they're no longer…The adoptee grows up, the adopted child grows up. So that they're no longer that child. And can they begin to have those adult conversations with their adoptive parents that include some of the hard, but honest parts?

Haley Radke: Okay. Let's do this. Can you give me two different statements they can use? So one is, "We're not going to Thanksgiving because we're going to spend it with someone else." Or, "We're not going to Thanksgiving. And we wanna keep it (the reason) private."

Lesli A. Johnson: Again, just being very honest, "Mom, Dad, we have this long-standing tradition of coming to your house for Thanksgiving and…"

Again, it's hard because I can't, I don't know if this person is in reunion, and if the parents know. But that could be an opportunity to say, "And since I have discovered I have more family, I'm choosing this year to spend part of the holiday with them."

And again, it's navigating a new dynamic, right? Couples have to do this all the time when they have to switch between their family that they grew up with and then their partner's family, back and forth. So it's having that hard conversation.

And again, "Because I'm in reunion, because I wanna be a part of Jim and Donna's life, because this is important to me–I'm choosing to spend Thanksgiving there," maybe. And then if, again, it could be an extended conversation. Maybe, "We could do something the following weekend." Only if that feels comfortable though, not to appease their decision.

Haley Radke: And then if we–maybe they don't know that we're in reunion, and we wanna keep that private.

What's the phrasing that we can use and how do we kind of shut it down if there's more questions that we're not ready to answer?

Lesli A. Johnson: Right. Which I'm guessing ultimately there would be, if you said something like, "I'm choosing this year to do something different." My guess is the natural response would be, "Well, what do you mean? What's different?"

The best thing to do would be to say, "I'd rather not share. I'm not comfortable sharing that right now."

Haley Radke: Okay. All right. That's, I mean, I think that's totally a fair statement and I think so many of us feel like we do owe people the whole story or we–but we don't we can keep, choose to keep things private if we'd like to.

Lesli A. Johnson: Right. And I–none of these conversations aren't necessarily easy, but in my opinion, that doesn't mean we should avoid them. So it's, again, it's reminding ourselves that we're–that we get to kind of pick and choose now, and that we can be honest and we (again), we don't have to convince anyone to agree with us.

Makes me think of the episode that we did on boundaries. It's just starting to establish boundaries and people don't… people that we're establishing boundaries around may not care for that. May not care for that at all.

Haley Radke: Yeah. Well, so here's a question in that same vein:

"Normally my family goes out of state to spend time with my family at Christmas. This year, I want to make that visit shorter in order to also spend time with my biological mother and her family. How can I explain this to my adoptive parents so they don't get upset?"

Oh, there's the key line right at the end there. "We don't want them to be upset."

Lesli A. Johnson: Right. And that's again, to my point, is there may not be an explanation that this person can give his or her parents that won't make them upset. But it's being able also to, you know, "This year, I've chosen to spend some time with my birth mother and her family," and his parents (his adoptive parents) get to feel however they want to feel.

They can feel disappointed, they can feel angry, they can… Again, it's–we can't change how they're gonna react. But when it's explained in a way of, "This is what I need to do this holiday." That it can–it's again, we're not…

Haley Radke: You can't keep everyone happy all the time. It's just not possible.

Lesli A. Johnson: Right, right. That's absolutely true. A lot of times the holidays is sort of the one time of year that maybe we do see family in person. And so, I think that lots of people save up their hard conversations for in-person, because they don't want to do it over text or email (which is–that's a good idea).

However, maybe doing it during the holidays, when things are a little bit charged as it is–I don't know if that's the best idea. Okay. Here's a question from a listener:

"I've determined that I'm never going to have a non-hurtful talk with my adoptive mom about my feelings as an adoptee. I'm pretty 'out' [in quotation marks] with most other people, but I have set this boundary with my mom. I also don't want to hide my feelings anymore, but how do I navigate this?"

Lesli A. Johnson: Yeah, so I think that's really wise. So again, it's practicing all these other skills to maintain, like self-regulation. So it sounds like she's already aware that she's probably gonna get activated while she's in the holiday, the midst of the holidays.

So, what are some things she can do? She can give herself permission to take a break, right? Whether that means go outside, have a support person on speed dial that she can call and connect with (someone who really understands her).

She mentioned that she had friends that understood her. Remind herself that this is temporary, that this period (and I think it's a good one for all of us to remember), that this is the period of the year, and it's temporary. It's gonna have a beginning and an end. And again, she can maybe make (if she's gonna be visiting her parents), maybe she can make arrangements to see other people. I don't know what the exact circumstances, but kind of balance it out and using the tools that she has in her toolbox.

Haley Radke: Okay. Thank you. Let's keep going. Okay. This is sort of a question about language, but there… Boy, there's a whole lot here. So let's see. Okay, let's see what we get to.

"I find myself using language like 'my family' [in quotation marks] when talking about my adopted family to my bios and 'this family' or 'your family' [in quotation marks] when referring to biological family. I think it kind of hurts them."

Okay, so this adoptee is saying, "my family" for adoptive family and "your family," or "this family," when talking about bio family. And then she asks, "Is this something I need to work on? It feels like I'm in between families, so any I give to one side, the other isn't satisfied. I need to figure out a way forward if I'm going to be spending more time with my biological family."

And then she's got a few more questions, which I'll get to. First, let's talk about this language thing. So I think she's feeling like saying "my family" is like the higher level of family, maybe? It's almost like a ranking? Maybe that's what the bio family feels like.

Lesli A. Johnson: Yeah. I think those are conversations to have with everyone involved. Right? So I think language is important, and at the same time, if we can talk about it in an open way… I guess I'm just thinking about–I've worked with a lot of people when adoptive parents, when their child maybe refers to their birth mother as "mom," rather than, forgetting to say "birth mother." And talking to parents and explaining, that they get to call whoever whatever they want, whether it's a first name, or if they forget to say "birth" before mother, then it doesn't have to have that much meaning.

Haley Radke: Or if they choose that. You're choosing to say "Mom."

Lesli A. Johnson: I would encourage this person to talk to everyone involved and find a language that maybe feels comfortable for her, but also maybe she can put herself at ease by expressing just what she did in that question. Does she–is there something there she can maybe unpack, too? What does it mean, "my family"? What does that mean to her? What does it mean "your family"?

And, again, she's saying feels like she's balancing. Well, that is exactly what it is, right? When you're in reunion, you're navigating two kind of worlds. But I think there's no–I think that it would be a conversation that she could have both with her adoptive family and her birth family and just say, "I'm not really sure what's happening here, and I'm still working on the language that feels right to me."

Haley Radke: So she says, "I need to figure out a way forward if I'm going to be spending more time with my biological family. Love is limitless, but finances are not. How do you decide who to visit and when? How do you be secure in your decision and not apologize for it?"

Gee, how do you decide that, Lesli?

Lesli A. Johnson: I don't know. I don't know if even if we talked for the rest of the time about that, if I could answer it. I mean, my first thought is approaching it in a very kind of mindful way of just sort of moment-to-moment, day-to-day, week-to-week, month-to-month.

And not making a big decision about how she's gonna spend…how she's going to spend future holidays or future time, but looking at it at each visit or each phone call. You know, checking in, like, How does this feel? Does this feel good? Do I wanna keep going and pursuing this relationship?

I guess by the tone of the question, it sounds like it's a newer relationship, so (like all relationships), just checking in and What does this feel like? And being aware of times when she might be making decisions based on someone else's expectation of her.

Haley Radke: I totally–this is what I was thinking. I was like, You know what? It's only been in my thirties (true story) that I have taken into account what I want. And so many of us, I think, have (just as you said before), right? We're trying to please our adoptive families. We don't wanna rock the boat, and yet you get to decide what feels good for you, and of course we have the obligations, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

However, we get to choose. And I like that idea of more "in the moment" decisions like you don't have to sit down today and be like, "Oh, let's make our 10 year plan and what is the most fair to everyone and this year it's this family…" and that it doesn't have to be like that.

Lesli A. Johnson: No, and I think it can, I think relationships can evolve naturally when there is that application of kind of just like more of a moment-to-moment awareness.

Haley Radke: And I think you've already addressed a little bit about this, but "How do you be secure in your decision and not apologize?" I think that's really, some of the boundaries piece you were just kind of speaking to and some of the other questions and just having that honest conversation.

And you don't have to explain yourself, right?

Lesli A. Johnson: You don't have to explain yourself. And I think part of it is also being able to sit with some of the discomfort. So, if I decide I'm not gonna spend Christmas Eve with the people that I normally spend it with.

And I let them know that in a clear way, and they're angry, I have to then use my tools to sit with that anger, or that disappointment, and (again), it's not my job to convince someone to agree with me. And I'm saying I don't– it could be you, it could be anyone, but it's learning to sit with the discomfort of someone else not agreeing with us or (again), being disappointed.

Haley Radke: All right. Next question. "This is my first year in reunion. I've done my best to reach out to everyone and keep lines of communication open because that's the standard I want to set. But where is the line between setting a standard and bending over backward for people who aren't putting in the same amount of effort?"

Oh boy. I think we've all been there.

Lesli A. Johnson: That speaks, I think, to what I mentioned earlier about the idea of expectation. So, we're all responsible for doing our work, and we can't make (or even necessarily expect) others to do their work. So I think it's, again, it's taking, it's practicing self-care and then hoping that other people will eventually do their work or will get up to speed, but not having that be the expectation, necessarily.

Haley Radke: Yeah. And you know what I'm kind of reading into this question a little bit is, talking about bending over backward for people who aren't putting in the same amount of effort.

Don't you picture that honeymoon stage where you're, oh my goodness, you're so invested, and you're connecting with all these different people. And this could be maybe siblings, or cousins, or aunts and uncles, and you're figuring out all these different relationships and it's a lot to juggle.

And yet for some people they're like, "Oh, there's a new person. Okay." And it's not as big of a deal as it is for us. And how do you kind of like "right-size" that in yourself without taking it as a rejection?

Lesli A. Johnson: Well, I think (again), it's managing those expectations, and recognizing that reunion means, I think, different things for different people.

And if this particular person is saying that she's all in and she's being truthful and transparent. And bending over backwards for people who aren't doing their work. I might say, maybe look at that. Where can you put your energy?

Where else can you put your energy where that allows you to feel a little bit more fulfilled? Maybe she can stop, or cut back on bending over backwards if it's not reciprocal. Right?

Haley Radke: Yeah, I think, I mean, there's gotta be a point, right? Where you realize it's not reciprocal and then make that decision like, "Okay, well maybe they're not as into it" or, whatever, like that's okay, right? Okay. Interesting. All

All right, let's shift the tone a little bit. Here we go. Oprah's gift guide. No. What is it called? Oprah's favorite things. Yeah, Oprah's favorite things. Here we go. We have a couple questions. Lesli, here we go.

"What gifts should I send my birth father and his family? Do you have any ideas?”

Lesli A. Johnson: Oh, I thought I did not see this coming.

Haley Radke: Okay. Here's one other question. No, I, oh, just wait. It's related. Gift giving with newly found bio relatives. Yea or nay, help. Lesli's quick. She's quickly like looking at Amazon. She's…

Lesli A. Johnson: I'm guessing there's not…The search isn't gonna have “best gifts to give to biological dad.”

Well, I mean, I could easily use some help in this one, Haley, but I would say what I mean…I don't know, books? A journal-like journal that they can document the progress of their reunion? I'm really trying here.

Haley Radke: Oh my goodness. You're actually giving gift ideas. I don't know what I've–I pictured you being like, “Well, what's your budget? And think about what (sort of) you want to do going forward and what's your normal family tradition?” I thought that's where we were gonna go and you're gonna give us a list. This is perfect.

Lesli A. Johnson: I don't know. I would probably think, you know, something…It could be a book. You don't–let's say, You Don't Look Adopted. That'd be a great book, right? Then maybe a journal. What would you–what's your suggestion?

Haley Radke: I was trying to think what I gave my first….Well, I'll tell you, I have had some gift giving misadventures. So I feel like this is a little bit tricky. What I think is, it's okay to have a conversation about it. And say, "Oh, is your family–do you guys give gifts at Christmas? Do you do that? What's usually your price range?" I think it's okay to say some of those things. Because, as I said, I myself had some misadventures in that area, so I think it's okay to talk about it.

Another thing I did with my bio siblings–we've been in reunion almost nine years now. We started, we actually–I had the conversation with them and we started doing a gift exchange where we draw names and so… I mean, do it however you want, but having the conversation about it to set up, "What does this look like? We've never done this before. Do you guys give gifts or are you more an experience family? Do you just call each other on Christmas or whatever? Any holiday that you celebrate, do you (I don't know), exchange Christmas cards?"

This is another question: "Do I send my birth mother my Christmas card this year? She's never responded to me, ever." I mean, those traditions (including gift giving)... I'm gonna go default on Lesli, what Lesli always says: have the conversation about it.

Lesli A. Johnson: I think it's that you have a…I had that conversation with my biological family (which is my birth mother, Candace, and then her brother, and her brother's wife), and we just decided they're not big on gifts. That was pretty easy. But I think if you don't have the conversation and make assumptions, that's not a great way to go either. But the conversation, and then a monetary limit, and… I mean, it would be really hard to give something to someone that if, especially if you just are getting to know them, right?

Haley Radke: Well, okay, I'm picturing this: you are like, Oh my gosh, it's our first union reunion. Here's my chance. And I am a gift giver. So I-– gifts is my love language. And you plan it all out, and you have this thoughtful gift, and you send this journal that you can write back and forth and you send… And then you don't get anything. Right? Think about just how devastated that could make someone, so if you don't have the conversation, or even just be like, "Oh, I'm dropping your parcel in the mail today." Letting them know something's coming so that they know, Oh, this is a gift giving situation.

Lesli A. Johnson: Right, right. Yeah. And all that could be avoided if you have that initial conversation, right?

Haley Radke: Yep. And Lesli is gonna drop her 10 things list of: Things to Give Your Dad.

Lesli A. Johnson: No. A little bit. That's a little bit more thorough.

Haley Radke: Okay. All right. Well, I think that was our most lighthearted question. We have just a couple more, some heavy stuff coming up.

"I have the worst time with holidays. Growing up, I never wanted to go to family gatherings because I obviously didn't fit in, and I felt uncomfortable in my adoptive family. I no longer associate with them, but now I feel the same way gathering with my fiancé's family. It's uncomfortable and a huge trigger for me to drink. I'm a recovering alcoholic. How can I help myself feel more comfortable in family gatherings, when I've never fit into a family and my main goal is to be accepted?"

Lesli A. Johnson: I guess I'm thinking about again, ways this person can take care of themselves in the midst of feeling uncomfortable. So, my first thought was, Where can she get the support that she needs?

So again, maybe she has a friend, or a support her go-to person on speed dial that she can kind of touch base with. Does she, has she shared with her fiancé what her earlier experiences were growing up? The holidays that she had with her family growing up, and why they were painful? And can she let him in on that, so that he's a part of that so that he has an awareness.

And then what can she do while she's there? Again, some of these just very practical grounding techniques can be really helpful when she gets triggered. This may sound really silly, but just even breathing. And if you're sitting at the dinner table and you're starting to feel uncomfortable, but you don't want to get up and walk away, just start taking breaths. And it doesn't have to be obvious, but there's a little trick, where if you exhale a little bit longer than you inhale. So if you breathe in for a couple counts, and you exhale for–breathe in for two or three counts and exhale for four counts, that activates the parasympathetic nervous system, which is the "breaks" of our nervous system.

So it calms us down. Nobody has to see you do that. Maybe she can, maybe, if it's possible, she can attend a meeting before something that she knows is going to be really triggering. And again, having a person that she can reach out to. If it's not, if it's a friend or someone–that sponsor, someone that she can contact if things get really uncomfortable for her.

Haley Radke: I have a couple questions about that, I guess. I don't really know too much about recovery, or if people like, share that–if people would know that she's a recovering alcoholic? What are your thoughts on making sure there's no alcohol at the event? Is that something people do? Do they, like, reach out and say, "Oh, can we keep this a dry event? Because I know someone's coming that's in recovery." Is that something…? I don't know.

Lesli A. Johnson: Yeah, I think it differs for everyone. I mean, I certainly know people who are in recovery that being around alcohol isn't an issue for them– isn't a trigger for them and others who it is. And so I guess that again, would be a conversation for she and her fiancé to have, well before they go to the holiday events, right? And if that's something that is–if having that around maybe it would automatically mean she wouldn't be able to attend if that was a trigger for her. But again, having this conversation prior with her fiancé.

Haley Radke: Yeah. And then the other thing is I was thinking like, do you have to go to things like this? There's always that choice as well, right? Have the conversation, yes. And say, "You know what? I'm just really not comfortable at big family gatherings. Is there one or two people in your family that you really want to connect with over the holidays? Can we have them over here for supper?"

Like an alternate way that she can still be involved with the family, but it doesn't have to be on such a mass scale. I don't know. I think that's a hard thing to ask for, but I think that might be a healthy thing to do. What do you think?

Lesli A. Johnson: Yep. I think that's a great idea and I think just even the wording of this question, “How can I help myself feel more comfortable in family gatherings? Gatherings when I've never fit in, and the main goal is to be accepted?” So I think that is a theme for a lot of people who are adopted. This idea of fitting in and I don't fit in. I would say now as an adult, finding places where you do fit in. So rather than trying to fit into places that you don't feel comfortable, find places where you really do feel comfortable and let that, let those places, and those experiences be your guide.

I think that's what we strive to do. I think in your work, and certainly in my work, is helping people find community. And whether that's an online community or in-person community. But those are places where adopted people feel like they fit in and don't have to make accommodations or, kind of change, or turn into shape shifters so that they fit in. They just are ultimately–they're accepted, just as they are.

Haley Radke: Right. And you can choose what things you want to participate in and what things aren't…I think I've said this a few times today, that there's this obligation and then there's all these events and things like…we don't have to do any of those things. Like we don't have to.

Lesli A. Johnson: It's true. I think though, and I absolutely agree with you… I think that has to be a real intentional thought process, though, because for many adopted people, they've had to go along. They've had to try to fit into their adoptive family. And so that's kind of a conditioning.

And so this idea that as an adult, Hey, you're right, I don't have to try to fit in. I can find places where I already know I fit in and I can say no, and I can… I think your idea of talking to a partner and saying, "I don't feel comfortable in big family events. Let's have a couple people over to the house." Or you could say, "I don't feel comfortable, but I really know it's important for you. So is it okay if you go by yourself?" I mean, some people might think that's horrific, but actually, no. It's okay.

Haley Radke: It's okay. I love that. Okay, this question is from a late discovery adoptee. She has a lot of hurt feelings towards her adoptive sisters who are older than her, and they knew she was adopted and they helped to keep the secret.

"My sisters have always been around me and never told me the truth out of respect for my adoptive mom. Eleven years ago, my adoptive mom wanted to tell me that I was adopted before she died of lung cancer, but I was four months pregnant and she didn't want me to be affected in any way. I know they love me and they wanted to protect me, but I'm still so hurt. How do I get over this?"

And so I imagine she's going to be seeing her sisters in the holidays and oh my goodness, this is like– Late discovery adoptee, this is like a life-changing thing. And this has just–she's just found out in this year that she was adopted.

Lesli A. Johnson: I think… and that sounds so difficult. And I think we could apply what we've been talking about this, for this whole episode is: perhaps (this year), a holiday gathering isn't something that she wants to attend. Making that… Checking in and deciding, is it something that is in her best interest this year? Or does she need a little more time?

If she's processing her anger. And it's not about, I don't think, getting over feelings. It's about moving through them, right? So she just may need more time to process what she's going through, and giving herself permission not to attend. If she decides to attend, all the other things that we've talked about: taking breaks, if she normally stays in the family home, maybe she'll decide to stay somewhere else at a more neutral place. Or if it's going to be…normally it's a week-long visit, maybe it's cut short to a couple days? Again, just permission to take care of herself.

Haley Radke: Can you give us some ways to say, "I don't want to talk about that right now?"

Right, because I think at events like this, there–especially when there's something like simmering under the surface, right? I think, sometimes conversations can veer into territory that we don't want to go there, because we're worried that something's going to erupt, right? So how can you say, "I don't wanna talk about that right now" in a polite way?

Lesli A. Johnson: Well, I think you could say, "You know what? I'm not comfortable talking about that right now." And you could just keep repeating that. And if someone doesn't respect that, you can put some distance between that person and yourself. I mean, there's, I think that's, "I'm not comfortable talking about that right now and I…" That can be adoption related stuff, family related stuff, politics, any… Imagining this year there's going to be a lot of people saying, "I'm not comfortable talking about that right now."

Haley Radke: Okay. That's great. There's another podcast I listen to and one of their favorite ways (it's kind of become a joke now), one of the favorite ways they just say, "Oh that's interesting. Can you pass the bean dip?" That's been, like, the way of getting out of those uncomfortable topics.

Lesli A. Johnson: That's interesting. That's interesting. Like that.

Haley Radke: I've never had an event that had bean dip at it, but I mean, I guess…? Okay. And even when I asked you the question, I was like, Ooh, how do you ask this while being polite?

You don't have to be polite. And even I–your answer is polite, I do think. But you also don't necessarily need to be, like, protecting yourself from getting triggered, protecting yourself from perhaps exploding, or crying, or whatever things that you might not want to do publicly. Like you'd rather run to the bathroom to have a good cry, or whatever. I think it's totally fair to just be like, "Nope, we're not going there right now."

Lesli A. Johnson: Right. Right. And again, the goal isn't the goal is not having everyone like us, agree with us, or be okay. It–that might make someone angry that we're unwilling to talk about something that makes us uncomfortable, but that doesn't mean we have to do it.

We don't– it's perfectly okay to say, "You know what, I'm really not comfortable talking about that right now," or, "I'm really not comfortable talking about that. Period." Not saying, “period,” but you know, not even inviting the conversation for another time.

Haley Radke: Right. Okay. That's a really good point. That's a really good point. The other thing I just wanted to go back to this late discovery adoptee that's asking a question. I think if you're able to, I think it'd be really important for you to start processing some of this with a therapist and if you want to (or if possible), you could also do that with your sisters if you're hoping to repair the relationship.

How do you think about that, Lesli? Having a mediated conversation with a therapist? I know. I know what you're gonna say.

Lesli A. Johnson: Absolutely, in any of these conversations… So any of these questions that people have asked, having that extra support of working with a therapist that gets adoption, that gets reunion, that gets–that understands family would just be an added benefit for sure.

And if her–it sounds like she cares about her sisters and if the sisters are willing to be a part of that healing journey–yes, absolutely. Great idea.

Haley Radke: All right, here is our last question.

"I was adopted around this time of year at a young age. My mother's Christmas gift was actually a paper stating my name had been officially changed."

Oof. Can I just say, yikes? Maybe this person loved this. I don't know. That for me is a yikes. Okay. Back to the question. Naturally, this time of year is more emotionally charged.

"I'm thinking about sitting my mom down and asking more questions about my story. I'm informed, but there are questions I've been scared to ask, but I don't really know how to go about it or even if I should, lest it trigger things."

Oooh. Okay. Now this question is one that I was sort of alluding to earlier when I was like, "Is now the best time to have these big conversations?"

Lesli A. Johnson: Right. Right. And that's a–I mean, that's a good question for the person to ask themselves: if already this time of year is activating for this person, maybe wait until after the holidays to ask more questions.

But certainly, if the questions are important and wanting to have more information, I think it certainly is a great conversation to have. But I agree with you. Maybe this time of year (around the holidays) isn't the best time.

Haley Radke: I mean, I think–I said this much earlier, when I was saying how this might be the only time we're in person with people. And so we feel like there's this extra sense of importance and Okay, now we can finally do this thing.

Lesli A. Johnson: Okay. So that's, yeah… If that's the case, I might suggest this person talking to (maybe to) her mom now and saying, "We're gonna be together over the holidays and can we schedule a time where we could go (just the two of us can go) and have tea, or have coffee? And there's some things I wanna talk about."

So kind of like laying the foundation for that conversation, and then be intentional about following up once they're together.

Haley Radke: Oh my gosh. I love that. That's so good. I didn't even think of that because it's…I don't know. I think sometimes when we–when this has been building and building, right?

And then you're at Christmas dinner or whatever, and you're like, Okay, now that it's out there, let's have this conversation when we're all three drinks in. And in front of everyone. Yeah. I mean, there's a time and place. Okay. That's so good. That's so good, Lesli. Okay. Thank you so much for such thoughtful answers, good advice.

I love so many takeaways. Is there anything else you want to just leave us with as we go into this season? Knowing that some things are gonna be challenging, we might be balancing a couple different things. Any tools or any last thoughts before we wrap up?

Lesli A. Johnson: Sure. I think it's just important to manage expectations, remind ourselves that this time is temporary. Enjoy the parts that can be enjoyed–put a lot of focus on those parts. Make sure we have our support systems intact, so we need to connect with them. And also just, I think, reminding ourselves that we can't please everyone and not everyone's gonna agree with the decisions that we make when it comes to taking care of ourselves and–but that's okay.

Haley Radke: And my two cents–You guys, I'm not a therapist. I podcast in my basement. My two cents is, we also get to decide what our celebrations look like or what our traditions…all of those things. We can start new any year and make our own traditions, our own celebrations. And giving some thought ahead of time to what we want things to look like, I think, is for… And what is within our own power to do. I think that's really been a healthy thing for me to do with my immediate family, especially. And I don't know, I think having those thoughtfully planned out things is, like, great. And there's also the spur of the moment, celebratory things we can do with friends. I think there's a lot of ways we can build in some nice things for ourselves during a season that can be so stressful.

Lesli A. Johnson: Absolutely. I completely agree with that. Yeah, we can't change others' reactions, but we can really take care of ourselves and it, like you said, there's–it's always okay to start new traditions.

Haley Radke: Awesome. All right. Wow, thank you so much. I loved that conversation. It was so fun, and I look forward to seeing your "Top 10 List" of things you should buy your new family for Christmas. Newly-found family, I should say.

Lesli A. Johnson: Perfect. I'm gonna start on that right now.

Haley Radke: Okay. And so we don't miss that. Where can we connect with you online?

Lesli A. Johnson: You can connect with me at my website, askadoption.com, Instagram at Ask Adoption, and Facebook at Ask Adoption, and Twitter @LesliAJohnson.

Haley Radke: Wonderful. Thanks so much, Lesli.

Oh my gosh. I love talking with Lesli, and I love teasing her. I don't think she's actually gonna write us a list of 10 key things we should gift, but that would be awesome if she did. Anyway, I hope that this was helpful for you, that you had some good takeaways of things that you can do to navigate this season, which is often a fraught time.

Anyway, I want to say a huge thank you to people who have been giving me something amazing, and that is their monthly support. Thank you. Without you, I literally could not keep doing this podcast, so thank you. I'm just so grateful. I've said thank you a million times. I'm gonna keep saying it. If you want to join them, go to adopteeson.com/partner.

It has the details of what you get as bonuses for your monthly support. There's even a whole other podcast I do. You guys, you're really missing out if you haven't heard Adoptees Off-script. There are some very candid conversations happening over there that are just too private to share on this main feed.

So adopteeson.com/partner has the details for that. I also want to thank those of you who share the show on social media. Those of you who have shared with your adoptees' support groups, those of you that have told one friend about an episode of the show that was meaningful for you. And that just means so much to me.

Adoptees On only grows when you share the show, and I'm so thankful when you do. And I can't respond to every tag, every DM, every email. It's just not in my capacity. But I do read as many as I can, and I'm so thankful for those of you who have sent thoughtful, lovely emails thanking me for the show. And you know who you are.

I'm just so grateful for your kind words. It sounds like I'm wrapping up. I'm not. We are gonna have a few more new episodes before the end of the year. I will let you know when our wrap-up date is, and then when you can expect new episodes back. I'm gonna guess mid-January. So thanks so much for listening.

Let's talk again, next Friday.

122 Dr. Tracy Carlis

Transcript

Full shownotes: https://www.adopteeson.com/listen/122


Haley Radke: This show is listener supported. You can join us and help our show grow to support more adoptees by going to adopteeson.com/partner.

You are listening to Adoptees On, the podcast where adoptees discuss the adoption experience. This is episode 122: Dr. Tracy Carlis. I'm your host, Haley Radke. Dr. Carlis is a clinical psychologist who I've had the absolute honor of learning from in person, two times, and today I'm thrilled to introduce you to her.

She shares her personal story of search and reunion with some DNA search updates that have just happened this year. Then, we are really going to take a turn in the conversation and focus in on her work in forensic psychology in the area of adoptee parricide. Yeah, that means we are talking about adoptees who have killed their adoptive parents.

We are gonna discuss violence graphically. At some points during this episode, there's also a mention of sexual violence, so please make sure you're listening without little ears around, and that you're in a safe headspace if that topic is difficult for you. We wrap up with some recommended resources, and as always, links to everything we'll be mentioning today are on the website, adopteeson.com.

Let's listen in.

I'm so pleased to welcome to Adoptees On, Dr. Tracy Carlis. Welcome, Tracy.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Thank you. Thank you for having me, Haley.

Haley Radke: I was just saying to you that I have waited two years for this interview, and it's not because I asked you and you made me wait two years. It's because I saw you speak two years ago.

And I just thought, "Oh my goodness, you're so thoughtful and insightful and have such fascinating work (which we're gonna get into).” I’m like, “I have to talk to you." So it’s happened! I'm so excited. Can I ask you to start out the way we always do, and would you share your story with us?

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Sure, I'd love to.

So, I was adopted back in the dark ages–when social workers were telling adopted parents that you ought to tell your child they were adopted early on, and then once you tell them, you don't have to talk about it anymore.

And the reason that social workers at that time were telling parents that was because the decade before I was born, social workers were saying, "You don't have to tell your child. They're not gonna remember the event, so why tell them?" So, of course we have learned that especially through our dear adoptive parent, Nancy Verrier, that the child was there and they had the experience of being handed over to strangers and that they suffer a profound loss.

And that it's not in the telling your child they're adopted, but more that they had that experience. So, social workers began to get that. And I remember–I do not remember my parents telling me that I was adopted. I do remember that they told me something that was very big and that impacted me and stayed with me always.

I think they probably told me when I was about three or four years old. I was adopted into a Jewish family; I was also adopted… I had a younger brother who was adopted after me. He was two-and-a-half years younger. I like to say that my therapy career started when I was about two-and-a-half or three, where I had a lot of people in my family who needed a lot of help.

The story that my adoptive parents told me about my birth mother was that she was 15 years old at the time, and that she loved me very much, but she was too young and didn't have enough money to keep me. And that didn't make any sense to me cuz I thought, even as a child, "Well, I would help her. Why couldn't I just, you know…? I would've been able to earn money and I could have just helped her.”

So it didn't make a lot of sense to me. And also the fact that she loved me made me feel really frightened about their love. Because if my first mother relinquished me, then perhaps they would, too. So I did a lot of hiding. I had a profound kind of sadness about being adopted that really wasn't acceptable in my family.

It was not okay to miss my birth mother. It was certainly not okay to talk about her. And so all that had to be very hidden and repressed. The only time I would be able to let out those emotions was maybe when I was in the shower. I could cry so no one could hear me, or if I was laying in bed with my dog at night and I would cry into him.

So that really affected everything I felt about myself. My birth mother didn't want me. I thought, “She probably forgot about me. What was wrong with me? Was I not lovable? Was I just born to someone who abandoned me and never thought about me?” That really plagued me.

When I was about 16 years old, I got the nerve up to ask my adoptive mom if there's a possibility I could find my birth mother. And that created a very big scene in my home where my adoptive mother was quite upset and crying, and my adoptive father didn't like that when she was upset. And that question was met with some violence in my home towards me, and I moved out the following year.

When I was 17 years old, I left home. And while I had nothing and no money; however, I had been working since I was about 13 years old, saving up money. Cause I knew that one day I'd probably have to leave. I had a peaceful place. I had a place where I could just be myself where I could cry and be who I was.

When I was 18 years old, I sent for my background information from Sacramento, which gives you all of your non-identifying information. So they–on one side they told me that my birth mother was 15 and her family constellation. It said also on there, the circumstances for my placement, for my relinquishment. And what it said was that my birth mother had been walking in the park and that she was raped by a series of boys in the park.

And that was quite difficult to read. However deep within me, I had this feeling that that story was not true, even though it was really devastating to look at. On the side of the paper that talked about my birth father, that was empty because she didn't know which of these boys had been the father.

That piece of paper, I put away for another decade. I locked it up in a cabinet, never looked at it for another whole decade. Then I had a big crisis in my life. Actually, it was with my brother, who turned out to have schizophrenia. And I had always taken care of my brother and I, in fact, I was his conservator for all my adult life, but he also became quite violent with me and it was a pretty big deal and sent me into therapy.

And that therapist happened to be an adoptive parent, and she told me that I could search for my birth mother. Back in those days, there was no Internet. There was, you know, no DNA. It was sort of the old school way of getting records. And I belonged to an organization called ALMA (the Adoptees Liberty Movement Association), who helped you, like, if you got your petition for adoption, where your name was listed on it or the birth mother's name was listed, which was whited out and blacked out. It was–you couldn't really see through it, but they had the special formula that kind of picked up some of the letters and you could count the letters.

And so it was really old school kind of sleuthing.

Haley Radke: I love that detective work.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: It was real detective work and even though it was so difficult, I found her within about a four month period and I made that first call to her with a lot of trepidation. I didn't know how it was gonna be received, but when I got to the, the date of my birth– "Does the date May 13th mean anything to you?"

She started to cry and said, "Yes. That was the day my daughter was born." And we both cried for a long time on the phone together. And then we met a week later, and that meeting was amazing. First of all, again, it was before a lot of the technology we have today. So I didn't know who was gonna be sitting there, just that we were gonna meet at a hotel lobby and I walked in the hotel lobby and I sort of scanned real quickly and I saw one little woman sitting kind of in the back, all perched on her chair.

And when she saw me, she didn't know me, but she must have thought, "Okay, that looks like her." She got up and started walking towards me, and I started reluctantly walking that way too. And she gave me a hug that–I had never really felt a hug like that before in my life. You know, somebody who felt like me, who… It was just so embracing and big, I don't even know how to really say what a big feeling it was for me.

And then we sat for about four hours together, talking. And she told me that when she got pregnant, she ran away from home. One of her neighborhood girlfriends, she [my birth mother] asked her, "You wanna run away?" And the girl said, "Okay." So they....

Haley Radke: “Sure! Sure, we’ll run away.”

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Yeah. And actually I found that woman, too.

She lives not far from me, and I found her after I found my birth mother. But they went down–They, first of all, they dyed their hair black in the gas station parking lot and went down to the bowling alley and found a couple of guys who were heading up to Washington, D.C. and they hitched a ride.

And I think when the young men tired of the girls, they left them in Washington. And then my birth mother and her friend Tanya asked a man who had an apple orchard if they could pick apples and get a little money. So they did that. They'd go to the local liquor store and buy (what she told me), tuna and beer. That was my diet early on. And they would sleep underneath the apple orchard.

And eventually, they got caught by the authorities and brought back to Los Angeles. And when her parents came to pick them up at juvenile hall, they saw that she was visibly pregnant. And then the remainder of the pregnancy, she was locked up in the house. And she told me that the only time that she was allowed out was at nighttime. She could walk between the sheets that were hanging to dry out in the backyard. She could walk up and down there, and she told me that she would talk to me and she named me, privately, for herself. And then she went into labor. She was taken to the hospital. She delivered me alone, by herself. And during those years, new moms were kept on wards and all the babies came at one time to the moms and then taken back.

And she was not getting her baby, but one nurse befriended her and took me to her one night before I left the hospital. And she told me that she just whispered in my ear that we would be together again. And I feel like that really penetrated and impacted me, because when I did my search, although I was very scared to do it, there was some sense internally deep within that it would be okay. That she would want me.

When she went back home, no one talked about adoption or what had happened to her and she was not able to stay at her home anymore. She kind of went on the streets of Hollywood and from that point, she hooked up with a lot of people who were also down and out and living on the streets, and they told her, "Well, let's help you find your baby."

And when I was about four years old, she had gone back to the doctor that delivered me along with her mom and her grandmother. They all used the same OB-GYN. And her mother went to one exam room, and the grandmother went to another exam room, and the nurse left her station. And my birth mother went behind the desk and opened the file and got her file out and found my adopted parents' names.

And from there, she found me. We– At that time, we lived on a cul-de-sac and all the kids play in the cul-de-sac until you were called in for dinner. And she would watch me on the street that was perpendicular to my street. And interestingly, I had a dream that started when I was four-and-a-half that lasted well into my twenties. And that was that I would be playing outside with my friends and that somebody was coming to try to take me away and I would have to fly up above the houses to be safe and to get away, but I never knew how to get back, get back home. So, that was pretty big. Hearing all that–while it made me sad to hear how my birth mother had suffered, inwardly, it made me so thrilled.

It was transformational, really, to know that she thought about me. She mourned for me, like I mourned for her, and that I was loved and lovable. So it was really a transformational experience. Yeah.

Haley Radke: So did you ask her about your conception, then? Because you had read this terrible thing in your non-identifying information.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: How would you possibly bring something like that up? I did. I just told her that this is what the background information said, and I wanted to know if it was true. And she said, "No, it wasn't true." But she was so afraid to tell the truth that she lied and made up that story to the social worker. Yeah, but that led to asking her just a little bit about my birth father.

I said and I– When I first met her, I didn't think that we looked alike. As I'm getting older, I see myself more in her. But I asked her about my birth father, "Did I look like him?" And she said, "Well, no, actually, you look a lot like my daughter." So she went on after those years that she was in the street at about 20, her mother said, "You know, you've gotta stop all this. Here's this nice guy that wants to marry you. Get married."

So she did, very early on to the relationship. She told her new husband–I guess he woke up one morning, saw her crying, and she said, you know, “I have a baby." And he didn't know what to do with that. So he said, "You know, just forget about it. We'll go on, we'll have more children."

And I think that was very impactful in their relationship, not feeling understood and not having, you know, an advocate there. But he didn't know what to do with that. But she did go on to have three more children. My sister, in particular, was very impacted by my relinquishment because she and I are born in the same month and we look very much alike, and my birth mother had a very hard time. So, when I came into the picture, my sister (for the first time) really began to understand what had happened to her and her relationship with her mom.

Through the years, I searched for my birth father. My birth mom had already said he was in the service. And again, it was sort of this old-fashioned way of searching. I found some ships that were in port during the time that I was conceived and then this friend that ran away thought it was a minesweeper. And then I was looking at muster rolls and it was crazy. I found three men that remembered her.

I paternity tested with one, but he was not my father and my birth mother just wasn't able to tell me or remember who my birth father was. I think there was a lot of shame about that period for her. So it just got really buried. So it wasn't until I met you at that conference that– And I was speaking on, I think, disenfranchised grief at the CUB Conference that I met Richard Weiss, who does a lot of work with Ancestry and said, "Why don't you try DNA testing?"

So I did, and I got back the results that said that I was 54% Ashkenazi Jew, which really thrilled me. Because when I met my birth mother, I got my background information, said that she was Christian and I was raised in this Jewish family and I never really felt Christian. I always felt Jewish.

I thought maybe it's just how I was raised. So I was really quite delighted. I found a couple of second and third cousins, but I couldn't really figure out how to go forward and find my birth father.

Last year again, when we saw each other at the AAC conference in Washington, I was fortunate enough to sit next to Kris Gilbert, who's a genealogist, who said, "I can help you," and she did. And God love her, I'll be grateful forever. And it was a crazy story too, because my birth father had changed his name. There's a lot of anti-Semitism back when he was getting into the workforce, so he changed his name. So that was really crazy. But I ended up finding him and that was an interesting call because how do you say to somebody…? His wife answered the phone.

How do you say, "I think your husband might be my father."? And I knew on that conversation– So I had to go very gingerly, saying, "I found some DNA. I'm not really sure how I'm gonna say this," but I gave her some, "So-and-so is my first cousin once removed, which means that her mom is my first cousin, which means that her dad is my uncle." And there were only two brothers in that family. Which I kept saying, "So that means that… " (kind of leading into it). Finally she was like, "Oh, my, what…!"

Haley Radke: What decade are these people? In their…

Dr. Tracy Carlis: So my birth parents, my birth father and his wife are both 85 years old. And they had been married for 65 years. They were high school sweethearts, but they were disconnected for a very short time. And during that time is when I was conceived. And in fact, later that afternoon, she called me back and she said, like, "Well, exactly how old are you?"

You know, really trying to do the math. But this experience, oh my goodness, it's very new. I just found them; it's been a couple of months. I've only seen them twice–once by myself, and once I brought my whole nuclear family. But it has been absolutely the most transformational point of my life.

When I first found my birth mother, the first night I spoke to her, I went outside and I looked up at the stars in the sky and the moon, and I thought, "Oh my goodness. Somebody who gave birth to me is on the other side–somewhere in this world." And I felt like I grew roots in my feet.

Like I really belonged to the planet. When I first talked to my birth father, I felt– I looked at the same stars and moon that night also, and I thought, "Oh my goodness, I was born. I am like everybody else in the world." It was just wild and they have been so embracing. More than embracing! They love me like their own.

In fact, they— I call her number three, my number three mom. It’s just been like, “I thought my life was complete before, but since you've come along, I really realized how complete it is and how blessed we are.” And they just, in fact, they, they live about an hour from me and they're talking just this morning we're talking about they wanna move closer to me.

They have another daughter, actually, they had two boys, and they adopted a girl. That daughter and I live not too far from each other. So it's just been unbelievably wonderful. I'm just thrilled..

Haley Radke: That's amazing. I'm like a fresh reunion, like all these years later. Wow.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Yeah. It's amazing. But all that pain that I suffered as a kid really is what prompted me to get into private practice. You know, my practice has been…I have a full practice. I see a lot of people, but primarily, my focus is on adoption, my specialty. And I do a lot of work with families, so I work with a kind of a psychoeducational model.

I do a lot of work with the parents, trying to help them understand the special circumstances that adoption brings to their families and the sort of normal developmental crises that all adoptive families go to, which Joyce Pavao, you know, wrote about that. I try to help them understand Nancy Verrier's work about the primal wound and how that is everlasting.

And, you know, no matter how good the adoptive family, nothing will take away that first experience. So I do a lot of that and then I really help kids, and I advocate very much for opening adoptions. So I have to get parents to a place where they feel confident that, you know, they're the parents, they’re always gonna be the parents, but that this will be really important for the child.

And I use a lot of my own story when I talk to parents and I help kids really do the grief work and the reunion work. And so that has really fed me. That's been–I've had a very nice private practice that's brought me a lot of joy and, yeah, I've really enjoyed that piece. Oh, and let me just also say that–cuz I've heard some other people on podcasts that you know, what kind of modalities we use as therapist and you know, I have a lot modalities that I use: EMDR, you know, where we use eye movements, emotionally focused therapy, where we look at more childhood, early childhood stuff, voice dialogue, where we talk to parts of self.

But really what I think is the biggest piece of my practice is being my authentic adopted self. And studies have actually shown us that the major positive outcome in therapy is a good relationship with the therapist. So it's more than using any kind of trick you might have in your bag. It's just really the relationship and I think people come to therapy to be heard and to be understood, you know, to do the reparative work from childhood, where they may not have been heard and understood.

So that, too, brings me a lot of happiness that I can help other families and other children not go so deeply into the kind of grief and wounding that I felt.

Haley Radke: I love what you shared at the very beginning of your story. You know, talking about being a therapist, you know, from age two-and-a-half.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Yeah.

Haley Radke: And, you know, even as you were sharing those things with us about those feelings that you were having and just the fact that you were able to identify them as such a young person and understanding like you had this longing for your roots and it's amazing that you've, you know, brought this all into–it’s not amazing, it’s of course. Of course you would bring all this into your work with clients. Absolutely. Okay, so you have this part to your practice. You also have another specialty. What else do you do?

Dr. Tracy Carlis: So, about 10 years ago, I was contacted by the Los Angeles Public Defender's Office regarding a case of a 19-year-old boy who had murdered his adoptive mother, father, and 16-year-old sister. And they found me and wanted to know if I would meet with him and, let me just say, the forensic work that I do is all death penalty cases. In California, the murder that I just spoke about has special circumstances, and that would mean that this 19-year-old was, would be a death penalty if he was found guilty.

His story…Well, it's the first time that I'd ever been in a jail, or actually…Yeah. First time I'd ever been in a jail. (I was gonna say prison, but it wasn't a prison.) I have been in prison, too. That's really daunting. I've been on death row, which is really, really daunting. So I said yes to the public defender's office and I went down to the jail.

The first time, I went with his attorney. But then I ended up meeting with this young man for weekly visits for quite a long time. He had maintained his innocence all through it, and the evidence was overwhelming that he did it. There was just no question. He came home late at night after being out with friends and his brother (adopted brother) was stewing about something.

The idea is that he came into the house and went upstairs to the parent's bedroom, where the father kept the gun. A wrestle, a struggle, ensued with the father. They were sleeping at the time, but he woke up and they wrestled with the gun. The father sustained one, non-fatal gunshot wound. This young man, I'm gonna call him “Brad,” he ran downstairs to the kitchen and grabbed a 13-and-a-half inch kitchen knife.

Parents came downstairs. Father was stabbed 17 times in the foyer. Mother was stabbed three times. The 16-year-old sister woke up when she heard the gunshot wound. She was found in the backyard with a cordless phone in her hand, trying to call 911. And she was shot and she was stabbed in the back three times.

Interestingly, adoptees, when they commit parricide, have dissociated from the experience. So that means that they almost don't know that they did it. So the next thing that happens is that they called 911 for help. "Something's happened to my parents." The police came out; they were looking at the crime scene.

They began to talk to Brad, and pretty soon thought that he probably was the person who did it and arrested him. I have been on eight cases since that. I've traveled to Kentucky, and to Arizona, and Sacramento, Texas… In Texas, I was on death row, which was quite an experience. Even Los Angeles County Jail was a very big deal.

You walk in, and there's like a cage. You first get into the cage, you have to leave everything that you have: keys, phones, you know, I was allowed to take a pen and my pad. Then when you're cleared and you're given a badge, you go outside of the cage, and then you're actually in the prison. And then they said to me, "Okay, well your room is down there," and I was like, "You want me to walk down there by myself?"

I had to walk past the medical unit, which had men. Each person in county jail is a different color, depending upon their crime. Like the murders, big murders like I was dealing with were in orange, but there was a whole unit of people that were in like a light green. Those were the medical people, but they were walking around.

So, I was instructed to go way in the back to a little room that had one little tiny window, way up top. (Not that anybody could see me.) I had quite a bit of fear that, you know… I kind of sized up the table that we were sitting on, like, "Could he reach across the table and, you know, strangle me or something?"

They brought him in in shackles, full shackles, feet and hands. I knew that if I was gonna be able to gain his trust, that I was gonna have to get him out of these shackles. Which was also scary, but I knew that it was just gonna be part of the developing a relationship with him. So after much ado, we did get him out of the hand shackles and he was kept in the feet.

So I met with him for quite a long time. But his dissociative amnesia for the events was so set in stone that he was really unable to tell us what happened, or admit to it. And he– The reason I met with him for such a long time was that his public defenders really wanted to save his life. He was gonna get life imprisonment without parole, that was a given, but at least spare him the death penalty.

But because he kept insisting he wanted to testify, they brought me in. And so I really did a lot of therapy with him. At the very end, right before trial, he finally conceded that he would plead guilty, and he did. So I learned a lot during that time about adoption psychopathology.

The way that I looked at adoptees while I did my private practice, where we look at what we call an object relations approach, an attachment model, a grief and loss model, was just not enough for this population. So I really had to dig and do a lot of reading about why.

And let me just also say that this young man had an IQ of 130, had never had any kind of criminal matters previously, was raised in a middle class family, you know, adopted a birth, wanted, loved. So it doesn't quite make sense when you see somebody like that and then you look at the crime.

Haley Radke: Well, I think one of the things you pointed out in your presentation was that we have this picture that, you know, these are people that have been abused in some way by their adoptive family and, like, this is their event. But that's not necessarily accurate.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: No. Actually, Between 2 and 3% of the population in the United States is adopted, yet adoptees are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, and the juvenile justice system, in drug and alcohol rehab centers, and were more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD, oppositional defiant behavior, conduct disorder, eating disorders, all those kinds of things.

So we really are an at-risk population and what I found was from doing a lot of reading and seeing a lot of these people who, in one swift cataclysmic explosion, murder their entire families is a couple of things. I wanna talk to you a little bit about Dave Kirschner, who did probably the most work in adoptee parricide.

He's not adopted, but he does have a private practice, where he sees a lot of adopted people. And so he says that there are certain characteristics–he calls it the Adopted Child Syndrome-–that certain adoptees, at the far end of the spectrum, are likely to do more poorly. And he says that– Okay, I just wanna talk about a few of the things that are common characteristics, I guess I'll say. That adoptees do not kill their parents because they've been abused. They murder because of the unresolved, underlying adoption psychopathology. Okay, so while the murder is about an evil act, it's also about loss, and abandonment, and rejection, and pain, and the search for oneself.

It's really about a quest for love and to be loved when… yet it evolves into something really malignant, a fatal quest to hurt. Biological children also commit parricides, but they come from families where typically they have been abused for many years. The characteristic there is, that they're abused by either alcoholic parents or mentally ill families.

And those children often murder their parents while they're sleeping, because they're so afraid of the parents. So the choice of weapon for a biological child, when they commit parricide, is a gun. For an adoptee, it is strangulation, or it is using a knife. So those are more like crimes of passion.

Haley Radke: Wow. I don't know. I almost don't even know what to ask you, because I spend a lot of time on my podcast, you know, trying to de-stigmatize talking about mental illness, or help adoptees not be pathologized all into one. So I know we're talking very small, you know, portion of adopted people that would do this. However, like, the cultural story of adoptees, right? Whatever's out there is like we're some crazy people– I read a lot of thrillers, and psychological mysteries and you know, the twist is often it's the adopted person, coming back to either kill their first parents or whatever.

Even as we're recording this right now, one of the big movies that's out is the Joker movie and (spoiler alert), you know, fast forward a few seconds if you can't already figure out what I'm gonna say. He was adopted and then, I think (I haven't seen it), but that he goes on to kill his adoptive mother.

So how do we balance this out? Tracy, I don't wanna pathologize adoptees and be like, "If we don't deal with our grief, we're gonna commit parricide." Like how–what are the things that we need to be doing? What we need to be paying attention to, from your research and work in this?

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Okay. So again, you know, I think that all adoptees are an at-risk population. Most of us, the majority of us, resolve to one degree or another, those issues. We do that through therapy, through search and reunion, through getting married, and having our own children, and filling up our own little island with good stuff. So the preponderance of us do resolve most of our issues, but we have to learn from those few.

And it's not few–I'll just say adoptees are 15 times more likely to kill an adoptive parent than a biological child. So it's not just a few of us at the end of the spectrum, yet, number-wise, it's not as many as people who resolve their issues. But we have to look at that population to really understand what are the underlying issues.

I know for myself, when I feel a partner may be abandoning me, or leaving, like in the middle of a fight, that can produce some pretty big feelings in me. And I can really understand how someone could lose control when there are certain things in line with this. The biggest reason that the event that happens before parricide happens, is that an adoptee may feel or perceive an abandonment.

So Brad that I was talking about before was not doing very well in school. His father had said, "I think I'm gonna send you to the military. You need to get your life together." That was one of the events that happened. Another young, (well, this is a little older man)-- The man on death row in Texas told me that his wife and children had moved out while he was at work.

He came home to an empty house. He went to go where his wife was to talk to her about reconciling, about not divorcing him. And they started to argue, and she went to close the door because she didn't want the children who were inside to hear. She closed the door, which left him on the outside, and he perceived that she was locking him out of his life. That he was gonna lose his children and lost his wife.

Another young man, 14-year-old, who came home from school. He was expelled. His mother came home, started yelling at him, was threatening to send him to one of these treatment centers. While she was yelling at him, spit came out of her mouth and hit his face, which was something that a foster parent used to do.

She used to sprinkle water on his face when he was bad, when he was very little, and that triggered him. So, are we a population of murderers? No, I don't think so. But do we all have some profound kinds of experiences that could make us vulnerable to that kind of violence? Yeah, there is a subset of people who get there.

Haley Radke: So what do you say to someone who is adopted and doesn't have a desire to search, or doesn't feel like adoption has affected them? Do you think they do have some buried grief and possibly repressed anger, or have they resolved that in themselves and are just okay with it?

Dr. Tracy Carlis: I don't know. That's, you know, that's the million dollar question, right?

Because adoptive parents like to tell me, you know, "Oh, my child doesn't really wanna search and they don't need to know." But if I ask an adoptee, "How would you feel if your birth mother knocked on your door and wanted to meet you?" That question is met with, "That would be okay." I think searching is a really, you know, we're taking some risk there.

We were abandoned once, right? Human nature tells us that once an event has happened, it's more likely to happen again. So we think that we're gonna be abandoned, even in our adoptive families, right? Or by our boyfriends and girlfriends, or by the birth mother again. It's just human nature to believe that once you've had an experience, it’s going to happen again.

A lot of people have the ability to repress and deny some of their experiences. That, for me, is a little bit scary, because usually something will happen that kind of opens up the can and then all those feelings can come flooding out.

The extreme sense of that is sort of dissociating from that part of ourselves that has feelings so as though it's, you know, a different person that's in a different room. But dissociation is not fully effective for us all the time, either. Some new loss or event in our life can bring it all up.

Haley Radke: It's so interesting.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: I just do wanna say that there are certain characteristics that we see in these (usually) teenagers, I'm gonna say, that create or that commit these crimes. And one is that there is a history of sealed records and secrecy within the family, and there is no talking about adoption. Which many of us have, but really sealed down. Number two, the person doesn't feel like they fit in or measure up in the family.

That's a big one. I had a young man in Kentucky. He was the first born, then they got pregnant, and had a daughter. The daughter was the apple of their eye. She was very successful. She was going to school to become a doctor. He was like a handyman who couldn't get a lot of work. And the other sibling (the girl) came home from a school break, and they were doting on her, and had a party for her celebrating her getting into medical school.

And he just felt like he wasn't what they wanted; he wasn't enough. And ended up murdering the whole family. There's also, for these kids, untreated and festering adoption wounds. With little or no mental health. So the child has all these feelings, they don't know what to do with them, and you know, in puberty, we're trying to forge an identity, which is very hard when you don't have bits and pieces of yourself. So that's why adoptees tend to be more vulnerable in adolescence. And then just the, like I said before, the most significant piece is that the parricide happens usually when the person is triggered by either perceived or real abandonment. Someone's leaving them.

Haley Radke: Well, thank you for that list. It feels very uncomfortable to hear those things, because, I mean, I think a lot of us have felt those in some way or another throughout our lives. So I think it’s…

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Yeah. That's why it's so important for us to study why there is this sector of adoptees that this happens to.

You know, I'll also just say, when we look at serial killing and mass murders, they are primarily adoptees. I know it's hard to say, right? I can see your face. Of the 500 identified serial killers in the United States, 16% of those, which is a pretty high percentage, are adoptees.

Haley Radke: And as you said earlier, adopted people only are 2 to 3% of the population in the United States.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Exactly, exactly. So when you think about though, serial killings, it makes a little bit more sense, because typically a serial killer and serial killing is defined as a murder that happens– defined as a person who commits three or more murders, when there's a cooling off period between the murders. So it could be months or years.

So Charles Manson, for example, serial killer who murdered many people, along with a group of people that he did that with. He was born to a 15-year-old girl, Kathleen Maddox, who failed to give him a name at birth. Instead, put on his birth certificate, "No name, Maddox." She married a man several months after she gave birth to him, who gave Charles the last name of Manson.

She went to a bar one day and had Charles with her. And then the server thought he was really cute, and wanted a baby, and was kind of talking to him. And his mother said, "Well, for a pitcher of beer, he's yours." And the server of course thought she was kidding, but she actually finished the pitcher of beer and left Charles in the restaurant.

An uncle came and found him several days later. Then his mother was in and out of jail. He was tossed around from relative to relative. Mom, when she did get out, promised that they would be reunited, live together, but instead she put him into a boarding school, which he ran away from and ran to her.

The next day, she returned him to the boarding school. I mean, you can just see, you know– You can see how the object relations piece, the relationship, really can make for a underlying anger and hatred that can produce really horrible crimes. For adoptees, the birth parent, that all of the anger, or loss, or rejection, or confusion should be directed to– it gets directed to the adoptive parents when they fail to understand and address what the adoptee is really feeling.

Haley Radke: Not to be alarmist, but let's not repress our grief.

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Do not repress.

Haley Radke: Aw. Thank you so much, Tracy, for walking us through some of those things and teaching us some about this. Is there anything that we didn't talk about yet that you really want to get to before we do our recommended resources?

Dr. Tracy Carlis: No, I do know it's a difficult conversation and I know that it scares a lot of people.

And I just want to say that most of us are not murderers and, you know, therapy, and talking is really the way to understand ourselves and our feelings and just having listening ears to… Even if it's not your adoptive parents, a good therapist that can help normalize all your feelings.

Haley Radke: Absolutely. Thank you. Okay, so for recommended resources, I'm actually gonna share two of the books that you've mentioned. One of the authors as we were talking, and then you shared this other one in your presentation at the AAC conference. So if you are super interested in this topic and you want to read more about it, there's Adoption Uncharted Waters by David Kirschner. And then there's also Adopted Killers. I mean, you guys, even the cover–it is very… I'm laughing cuz it's just, you know, like I find this really fascinating, but I also, as you said, right, it can be really upsetting. But I don't think you know this, probably, Tracy, but I'm obsessed with true crime podcasts and I listen all the time.

Yeah. Just one more thing to add to my to-be-read pile. I haven't read it yet, but it is definitely on my list. All right. What would you like to recommend to us today?

Dr. Tracy Carlis: Well, you know, again, I am a big believer in therapy. So, in here in Los Angeles, we have Jeanette Yoffe, who was a foster child for a lot of her growing up and then adopted a late age, has the Celia Center named after her birth mother, where it– She provides groups for, not only for teenage adoptees, but also for all members of the constellation.

So birth parents, adopted parents, and also for adoptees. So I think that's a really good place, here in California, anyway. I also just–if anybody here is listening, that is thinking about doing a degree and becoming a licensed therapist, I just really encourage you to do that. Because we need more adoption proficient therapists.

Other than the one therapy experience I told you about when I was searching for my birth mom, all of my other therapists, I've had to educate about what adoption means. And that can be tough, because we're really looking for someone to validate what we feel and not just have to educate. So if you're thinking at all about being a therapist, stay in school or get to school and we need you. We need more people to do this work.

Haley Radke: Absolutely. Oh my word. Absolutely, I can't agree with that more. Thank you so much for your time today. And where can we connect with you online?

Dr. Tracy Carlis: So, my website is drtracylcarlis.com. Also on Facebook, same: Dr. Tracy L. Carlis. Can connect with me either one of those ways. Email is a little bit longer. It's drcarlis@drtracylcarlis.com.

Haley Radke:Perfect. Thank you!

Dr. Tracy Carlis:You're welcome. Thank you for having me. I just wanna say the podcasts are amazing. I have–I'm pretty new to them, but I have been binge listening, I guess you say, to them, and they're fabulous. So, doing a great job. I really appreciate your work.

Haley Radke: Aw, thank you. That is so kind of you to say.

Every time I have seen Tracy speak, I just sit there in rapt attention, taking notes furiously. You should see the notes I have from her session in Washington. It's two pages of typed notes. Such a fascinating topic and I'm so intrigued by all the layers and I feel like we could have talked for like two more hours about her expertise in this area.

Anyway, I'm so grateful that she was able to come and talk with us, and I got so excited recommending the books that she shared in her presentation that I think I forgot to say the name of one of the authors. So the author for Adopted Killers: 430 Adoptees Who Killed–How and Why They Did It is by Lori Carangelo.

But, of course, the link to that is in the show notes, so you can go ahead and find that over on adopteeson.com. And I just wanna say a big thank you, again. I'm so grateful to all of my monthly supporters who make this show possible. Thank you. If you wanna join them and stand with them and say, “Yes, I believe this is so important and we want Adoptees On to continue to highlight adoptee voices,” go to adopteeson.com/partner and you can find all the details of how to support the show there. Another great way to support the podcast is just by telling one person about it. Maybe you have a friend that's into true crime podcasts like me. Maybe this is a good one to get them interested.

I don’t know; it's not funny. Like why am I laughing so much at adoptees murdering? It's not funny. I think I've listened to too many girlfriend chat true crime podcasts. I think maybe that's why. Anyway, if there is one person that you think would really find Dr. Carlis' work fascinating, just like me, maybe recommend this one episode to them and help share the show in that way.

Thanks so much for listening. Let's talk again next Friday.

121 Dr. Sue Green

Transcript

Full shownotes: https://www.adopteeson.com/listen/121


Haley Radke: This show is listener supported. You can join us and help our show grow to support more adoptees by going to adopteeson.com/partner.

You are listening to Adoptees On, the podcast where adoptees discuss the adoption experience. This is episode 121, Dr. Sue Green. I'm your host, Haley Radke. I am honored to introduce you today to Dr. Sue Green, a psychologist from Australia, who was actively involved in the landmark Victorian Adoption Act of 1984.

Sue will share her personal story with us, and then we dig into what led her to become an adoptee advocate, who now teaches other therapists, and mental health professionals how to truly be adoptee-competent in working with our loss and trauma. We also touch on some interesting facts about adoption in Australia that will likely surprise you, as they did me.

We wrap up with some recommended resources and as always, links to everything we'll be talking about today are over on the website, adopteeson.com. Let's listen in.

I'm so pleased to welcome to the podcast, Dr. Sue Green. Welcome, Sue.

Dr. Sue Green: Hi, Haley. Very excited to be with you over the oceans.

Haley Radke: Yes. We are so far apart and we’re on different days. It's very exciting that we are able to, you know, be awake at the same time. But I actually got a chance to meet you earlier this year, in Washington, D.C., and I've just re-listened to your presentation (which was wonderful).

And we're gonna get into a whole bunch of your expertise in the area of adoption. And why don't we start out with this, though? Could you share your story with us?

Dr. Sue Green: Yeah, certainly, Haley. I was born in 1957, which is quite some time ago now. And I always knew I was adopted. As a young child, I used to be read The Chosen Baby story by Valentina Wasson, which, you know, I was very disturbed to see was still in edition from, in 1986, with a new cover.

But that talks about a Mr. and Mrs. Brown who can't have children. And so they ring up Mrs. White to ask for a baby. I'm obviously Sue Green, so it was Mr. And Mrs. Green. And the book actually says, you know, "Mrs. White, we wish to find a baby who would like a mother and father, and who could be our very own."

And so, in this whole story, there's nothing about our mothers and fathers. And as a child, I used to love this book, but I remember saying to my parents, "Oh, was that before I was a piece of paper?," you know, events that occurred before I came into their family. And it was like I understood I was a transaction, or illegal contract.

And being in the era of closed adoption, adoption wasn't talked about. I felt very guilty or bad for asking any questions, so I tried to fit in as best as I could. You know, my parents were very loving. It's a good adoptive family. However, there were two differences to The Chosen Baby story. One is, my father told me rather than Mrs. White ringing up and, "We've got a baby for you," that they went along to the babies’ home and I smiled to them from my cot. And that I actually chose them, which is a different spin on it. And the second thing, is that I was what's called in the literature "the fertility charm," in that my parents had a homemade baby four years after me.

Haley Radke: Ok, I have not heard that one yet. Oh my gosh. Wow.

Dr. Sue Green: It's very known in IVF circles. And it's very sad. You know, after my father died, I found this little packet of photos that I'd never seen before and I'm holding a baby. I'm about three-and-a-half or four, and it's not my brother. And my mother had actually had another baby on pre-adoptive placement when she conceived, and she had needed to hand this baby back because she couldn't be pregnant and pre-adoptive.

And she'd never spoken to anyone about this. So, you know, in her old age, I was able to talk about that and she had enormous grief and loss. And it's still one of my tasks is to try and find that little baby, because I don't know what happened to him, but I have no recollection of holding him. Anyway, I'd probably say I had a pretty rocky adolescence; I was fairly non-compliant.

And I was in 1-F. We used to have 1-A, B, C, D at school. I was in 1-F for a while. Probably my saving grace (and my parents were probably mad), but I was absolutely horse mad. And I used to go to the auctions and buy unwanted horses that were very damaged, and work with them.

So I sort of did animal-assisted therapy before it was even invented. And somehow once I got to the end of high school, you know, there were very few people in our class. I actually passed, and then left home and went to uni. And all my life through uni, I worked in bars, and people would come up to me and say, "Now where are you from?"

Or they'd start talking to me in Italian, or "You just look my cousin, north Verona…" and so on. And I'd have to say, as all adoptees do, "I don't know. I'm adopted. I don't know. I'm adopted." So that led me to search. And the other thing that led me to search was, I read Lost and Found by Betty Jean Lifton, which was the book of the day.

And of course it's got “Adolescent Baggage,” “The Chosen Baby” story, “The Right to Know.” And that was a–it was like that book was written to me. And you know, something we say in the adoption movement, is there's been a professional silence and denial of adoption as an issue. And that the people that have spoken out about it (as you have talked about), talking the truth from the fairytale, are the people with the experience. And particularly people like Betty Jean Lifton and Nancy Verrier and Joe Soll, and we've got our own Nancy Robinson (who's a mother in Australia), talking about their own personal experiences with a, you know, a clinical bent.

So, those two things are really powerful to me. So, growing up, I knew two things. I knew my parents had told me that my parents were married, and that they lived in the country. So, you know how we fantasize as we are growing up. I used to think I was a part of a large, Italian, or family that grew vegetables, and they had a bad crop and they couldn't keep me. This was sort of my image, you know, my fantasy,

Haley Radke: Oh, that one bad crop, that'll really do you in.

Dr. Sue Green: And so, I knew I was placed in the Methodist Babies’ Home. So, during this time (and I can't remember–it would've been the late 70s, early 80s), I went to the Methodist Babies’ Home to get my non-identifying information. And it's a very big, large, Victorian building. And I was sitting there, and the social worker was in the desk opposite me, and she had my file there.

And I was the good adoptee, and I just sat there and she said, "Oh, excuse me, I just need to go and find something." And I didn't walk over and look at the paperwork, cuz she wasn't allowed to tell me the name at that time.

Haley Radke: So it was right there, but you didn't look.

Dr. Sue Green: No, no.

Haley Radke: Now, ok. Do you think she left to give you an opportunity, or she legitimately was just leaving?

Dr. Sue Green: I don't want to identify, but I think she left to give me an opportunity. It wasn't easy to tell me, but you know. The irony is when I found out my information. My mother knew– My adoptive mother knew my mother's first name, and my father knew my last name. Because this was pre-1960, when they actually had the information of the parents and the family when they signed the adoption.

But they–until I told them, they had never talked about that. So, that's a sideline. So I drove home (as you could be imagining), just, like, feeling so upset and angry with myself. That's really when I got involved in the advocate movement for change of legislation. And they're an amazing group of people in an organization called Jigsaw (at the time), who had been doing that for a long time.

And it's actually a woman, Pauline Toner (who was previously my local member here), who introduced that legislation in '84 for identifying information for adoptees. And it was a bipartisan approach, i.e., both sides of politics (like the Democrats and the Republicans) actually agreed on something.

Haley Radke: So is this, was this federal legislation, or was it state?

Dr. Sue Green: State. Our adoption is run and managed, and the information is state-based. So, we've got different legislations in all the different states. So, I'm talking about Victoria at this time, and mothers and fathers (we don't use the term “birth” or “first” mothers)... Mothers and fathers also advocated for that at the time, but they lost, you know, there was lots of media around.

They'd come and break up happy families. And there was also media around, you know–there has to be something wrong with you if you're looking, as an adoptee. And so that's why the counseling provision was in at that time.

Haley Radke: So that you had to go for counseling before you could search? Before they would give you any information?

Dr. Sue Green: Well, you got it that day, basically. Because you had your name down and people… You would go and see a social worker, and she'd just talk about, perhaps, why you are wanting to search and give some preparation (which in some ways, I think is a good thing). And then you would get your information, so it wasn't conditional.

And of course, there became a huge demand. And so they started doing just a group session, you know, about that. And then VANISH was funded to self-search, which has been happening for 30 years. So, that occurred. So, I wrote to my mother and father, who were still alive at that time. I got my records, and I discovered I had been the youngest of a very large group of siblings. And one of my brothers was actually with me at the time my mother gave me to the Methodist Babies’ Home. And I was actually there for three months. So I've actually had three names. My birth name was Marjorie, my name in the institution was Ivy, and then my adoptive parents called me Susan. And during that time, they had (in '57)--it was almost like an orphanage.

There probably would've been 20 or 30 children in that room. And they used to prop-feed babies, i.e., not touch them, because there was this notion of attachment. That, you know, to be able to attach to a new mother, you couldn't have had previous attachments. And you know, that's something I talk a lot about, is around the confusion between bonding and attachment.

That with your mother in utero, you are bonding. Attachment occurs then with the developing relationship post-birth. And lots of people say, you know, “It was men that invented attachment theory, because they hadn't experienced the bonding in utero.”

Haley Radke: Okay, that makes sense.

Dr. Sue Green: You know, we still sort of have this fallacy. You see these, you know, parents–adoptive, prospective commissioning couples, either a surrogate or an adoptive person. You know, the baby's born, and they wanted the baby to attach to the mother. Well, it doesn't work like that. Attachment is a slow process. Bonding is something that's occurred for nine months.

Anyway, that was the theory during that time. And so, I arranged to go and meet my parents and the brother that was there at the time I was lost to adoption. We don't use the term “given up,” or whatever we took. For parents, it's “they lost their child to adoption,” or for an adoptee, it was “separated from family, through adoption.”

So, you know, very careful about language we use, that's non-traumatizing. Anyway, I– My brother took me round and I met my mother, and my father (who was very ill at the time). Meeting my mother was an astonishing experience. We've got the same eyes, the same sort of ugliness. And she took me by the hand, and took me out to show her vegetables, and I was in my vegetable garden, and all this sort of thing, you know?

And I mean, I didn't talk for 24 hours after that event. I was just, in total… I was stunned, I suppose. And of course my mother said, "Oh yes, and there's another one, too." And so we have a lot of adoption in our large family.

Haley Radke: So that was— the story was true. They were married, because you were the youngest.

Dr. Sue Green: And my father was a farmer.

Haley Radke: Okay. And the vegetables were doing okay at the time of your meeting.

Dr. Sue Green: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. We call that synchronicity, don't we?

And so then, one of my sisters got a dinner party together with… My siblings sort of live all over Australia. It's a bit like the States, you know (we're about the same size), and so not all of them were there. But I love Betty Jean Lifton's term "twice born," cuz that's how I felt. I felt like the little baby in the crib again and everyone going, "Oh, doesn't she look like so-and-so,” and “Oh you do this just like so-and-so." And we, as adoptees, never had that relational experience of being the baby and the… And the other thing was, they all sat there drinking wine and after the meal, they left their plate there and the table was in disarray…

I grew up in a family where it was temperance; we didn't drink. And the meals would be cleaned up and the breakfast set for morning, you know, the minute after. Cleanliness is next to godliness.

And so, I felt this enormous sense of coming home. Both sets of my parents are now dead, so I've sort of been 30 years now connecting with various my siblings. I think the struggle with it is, I really agree that you have this false self when you're growing up in an adoptive family, that you have to accommodate. And how do you know what is “you”? And then when you meet your siblings (and it doesn't happen for everyone), and your parents, you see how much commonality there is. And things that you were thought were fiercely independently yours, aren’t. So you know, that discovering who I am is still going on, and I really appreciate the relationships (particularly I have with some of my sisters, around that). Yeah, that's basically my story.

Haley Radke: So you were in your–were you like just early thirties, then, when you first connected with your family?

Dr. Sue Green: Yeah, I've got the legislation changed in '84. I then gave birth to a son who was disabled in '85, so that sort of put me on the back burner a little bit. And so I was around 31/32 when I reached out.

Haley Radke: And you were still in contact with some of your siblings, then, to this day?

Dr. Sue Green: Well, Facebook's a wonderful thing, isn't it?

Haley Radke: Well, there you go.

Dr. Sue Green: Yeah. But you know the ones that live in Victoria, definitely. And I had a message from–I've got two sisters in another state, but I got a message just not full last from one of them. So yes, I am still in contact. I mean, the amazing thing is that.. My mother's quite old when she had me and some of my oldest–only one brother knew about my existence.

Some of them didn't even know about the other brother that was lost to adoption. You know, my sisters think it's amazing that they didn't know my mother was pregnant and cuz she, you know, she was living in the household. But I think we forget that in those days, you wore big smocks and you didn't proudly talk about the pregnancy.

And they were 14, 15, and probably off doing their own stuff when I was born. But you know, I've been fortunate in that I've been accepted, but you know, you can never get back all those years that you didn't live with people, despite the commonalities. Yes. Yes.

Haley Radke: Isn't that the truth? Now, you were mentioning (and you've hinted a couple of times), at this history you have with advocacy and, kind of, knowing the insider stuff. Why don't you switch and tell us about your professional career? And how did you come to be Dr. Sue Green and the expert that you are in this area?

Dr. Sue Green: I don’t know that I'm an expert, but, look… My first job was– my first job after I did master’s in psychology was running a small agency out of a shopfront. Now these days, we have lots of counseling services in shopfronts, but you know, literally in a shop, in a shopping center. And it was one of the first family support funded services, family counseling services in Victoria. And because I knew people in the adoption network, I started getting referred all these teenagers that were adopted, and some of them were in our boys' and girls' homes because they'd offended, or whatever. So, I used to just sit and say, you know, "Do you ever feel stolen? Do you ever feel angry? Do you ever think about your mother and father?"

And they'd sit there, and they'd go, "You mean my real mother and father?" And I said, "Yes. Does anyone talk to you about this? Are you confused?" And so I would just have very open discussions with these kids because I knew, as a teenager, I had held all this in and I had no one to talk to.

I mean, growing up, I think there was a boy up the road and he was an Indigenous child. And, of course, we've had the stolen generations with our Indigenous people, and I remember him at school being bullied and teased. You know, he’s the only dark-skinned kid, so I didn't want to identify or talk with him, even though I knew I was adopted.

But I knew no one else, all through my school years. And I mean, odds would be there would've been other adopted students there. But I just knew that– particularly in adolescence, you don't like talking to people about your inner feelings anyway, but this divided loyalty in adoption… So I would just talk to those kids and I mean, I worked at the children's court (which is for parents who, you know, drug taking or whatever), mediating for 19 years. And I would always ask the question, "Have you had an experience related to adoption?"

And I actually saw some of those kids I saw 20 years earlier, you know, during that time. So it's something I've always had sort of feelers for. And I've always asked the question, and that's what we encourage all practitioners to do: to ask the question.

Haley Radke: So, you fast forwarded, because you're already a psychologist and then you're getting these referrals for these– What drew you to the field of psychology? Do you know? Did you want to know more about yourself?

Dr. Sue Green: Look, I– We had no career counseling then. I think I wanted to be a wool classer at one point. You know, that's in the shearing sheds. I have no– I wanted to be a mounted policewoman, but I was too short. I have no idea what drew me to psychology. But I'll tell you something, Haley, we've had probably about 350 counselors come through our training. And I would say, one in five have an adoption experience, or they're married an adoptee, or their mother was, or you know, they're related to adoption in some way.

And I think it would be really interesting to research to know how many therapists go into the helping profession because they've had that experience. I do know that all my growing up, I was very sensitive to what was being said. I don't know. But yeah, I can't explain why I went into the profession. It wasn't because I want to work with adoption, or I want to do clinical work. It was just…

Haley Radke: That part just came to you later.

Dr. Sue Green: It was a drift. I mean, I did sociology as well, and I did the sociology of prisons and so on. And then, we were very lucky we had a program, one of the early master’s programs.

Haley Radke: Well, I wanna kind of switch gears, because you were, you know, talking about just your experience with the courts and working with all of these very troubled kids, and then you see them later as adults. And how did you start really working with adult adoptees and understanding there's like this huge hole in care for them? And then, in turn, training other therapists and psychologists to become not just adoption-competent, but like adoptee-competent?

Dr. Sue Green: Look, I think it was being a part of the adoption community for so long and knowing everybody's experiences, knowing their experiences of going to therapy themselves and having to educate the therapists. And you know, if you talk about psychology training (and it'd probably be the same in social work)--we didn't mention the word.

I don't think–I did six years and didn't mention the word adoption once and yet, you know, past adoption, Baby Scoop Era, there's plenty of us still around, all as walking adults who have needs, and yet it is unacknowledged. There's a professional silence about it, and I suppose that's something I've connected with.

And just knowing, you know, Victorian Adoption Network for Information Self-Help, which I was involved with–I wasn't on the first committee, but that was made up of adoptive parents, adoptees, and mothers, and we had some independence. It now has donor conceived and intercountry adoptees on it, but being involved in that community and even 30 years later, we still have so many unmet needs around funded counseling.

We still have people searching. We have the ripple effect. We have the children now searching. So you know, there's a– We know there's enormous need there, but it's not acknowledged publicly. Although, I'd have to say with the apologies, Senate inquiry… Just last month there was in The Women's Weekly (which is a very populist women's magazine in Australia), there was a story of a mother who lost a child to adoption, who was also an adoptee. I might have had it wrong, I just skim read it in the hairdressers’ the other day.

But you know, we've had a lot of media and my next training is going to be associated with… The National Archives of Australia have this traveling exhibition Without Consent, and it's about the whole forced adoption era and it's got adoptees, and mothers, and everyone's experiences, and photographs, and so on. And that's a traveling exhibition around Australia. So, slowly, we are having people acknowledge that if you say you're adopted, they don't just say, “Isn't that wonderful? Oh, I was reading something about that,” and there's some connections of deeper understanding.

But I'd have to say we've still got a long way to go, because in some states there's a real push to adopt children from out of home care. And my fundamental position is that, “Why is adoption different from long-term foster care, permanent care…?” It cancels and falsifies the birth certificate. And, you know, it suppresses the truth to support a fiction, as was said at the conference. And whether you are adopted from care, intercountry, donor-conceived, understand there's lots of embryos now that might be adopted: the birth certificate is falsified.

And so one of our issues is about having integrated birth certificates, so everybody's relationship to the child is on the birth certificate. So, I'm not sure how I got onto this tangent now. But the understanding of adoption– the basic identity information is a lie, and it continues to be a lie in modern adoption.

Haley Radke: Well, I would– you answered a question that I had for you without even me asking because… So I live in Canada, and this year they had a Senate inquiry and there was a recommendation made to give an apology for the post-war adoption era, and nothing really came of that. The–I don't know, it's sort of on pause. Yeah.

So I'm not sure. I can't speak to it more than that, but… So you were just saying that, you know, Australia has had an apology, and we're gonna talk about that a bit more in recommended resources. And so you're seeing a bit of a shift. But, interestingly, I mean– Can you talk about the status of adoption in Australia right now? Because it doesn't happen much. Am I correct in saying that?

Dr. Sue Green: Yeah, I gave my stats in the presentation at Washington. Now, across Australia in 2017/18, we had 330 adoptions. Now that includes stepparent adoption, intercountry adoption, adoption from care, and local adoptions (which we'd call our infant adoptions).

So if you're looking at infant adoptions, we had 32 that year. So there's seven states. So you divide that by that. Now, Australian population's about 25 million; America’s like 300 and so on. If you look at 1% of the population and our adoption rate, you– America (and I can't speak for Canada) is adopting at least, I think, 30 times that amount.

I think there are 16,000 local adoptions and overall about 78,000, if you include out of home care and everywhere else. So. Yeah, adoption… but we've still got an issue with saying, you know, they'll say, "Past adoption is in the past, cuz now we have open adoption." But the– And there's a push for that. And we have some very powerful lobby groups, including some of our film stars like Hugh Jackman and Deborra-Lee Furness, and so on, who argue there's these children that need a home. And we would still argue, open adoption actually doesn't make much difference when you are falsifying the birth certificate.

You're not allowing a child to live with their name. And that when they turn 18, if they choose to be adopted, that's something they can do. Knowing that we have probably more adoption dispensations, (i.e., people want to become unadopted through the court), as people choosing, but… And we've had the whole stolen generation, so we had an apology for the stolen generations that was our Indigenous children.

There was a policy of genocide and assimilation by removing babies, and placing them in white families.

Haley Radke: So, in Canada we had something similar, called the Sixties Scoop in Canada. And, I think something similar, again, happened in the U.S.

Dr. Sue Green: There was a Native American adoption project in 1957, which deliberately took Native American children, and placed them in white families.

So that is an intergenerational trauma effect in our Indigenous community. And there was an apology privately, post-adoption of policy for them. And one thing I noticed in the States–I was just quite shocked–is we always acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land and respect elders past and present and emerging, in acknowledgement that we took people's land and we took their children. So we have that whole history of acknowledgement, as well as the acknowledgement of past forced adoptions. But I would still say that there's a very strong push for adoption in Australia, because it does get sometimes linked to the abortion, and it should be quite separate.

"There are all these children in care that need loving families." "We have infertility still, one in five." So there's a very powerful push around the adults’ rights to parent as opposed to the child's rights. And so that's still an argument, I think, that just has to be argued over, and over, and over again.

Haley Radke: That's interesting that there's like this swing back towards pushing for more adoption. Because would you say that the apology perhaps has given mothers in temporary crisis more resources, or more supports to parents, instead of losing their child to adoption? Or am I just sort of stretching that a little bit?

Dr. Sue Green: If we're talking about the modern day, I would still say that we have very strong moral judgments–if you're taking drugs, or homeless, or you know; in the old days it was having a child out of wedlock or whatever. And we don't provide support and grief counseling for those mothers, and fathers, and grandparents, and families, and siblings enough.

And my big concern around open adoption is unless you support that family, they're not gonna be able to have any ongoing contact, particularly when it's not in contact orders. At least in Victoria, we have contact orders. So I still think we have a very strong ideology about being very judgmental to people who, for whatever way, are not coping.

And we've gotta recognize that parents in our child welfare system often have had parents who were raised in institutions that were also homeless. It's an intergenerational issue, poverty, often. It's not something that is necessarily their fault. You know, we're born with inequalities. So, I actually ran a training day in another state, which the mothers from past adoption wanted to organize. And it was a very interesting day because the acknowledgement of the loss and trauma of parents, I still think has a long way to go, too. And the disenfranchised group. And, you know, so forth.

Haley Radke:Can you tell us more about that? So you do training for both professionals who are actually working in, you know, psychology or therapy of some kind, and also other people?

So can you give us a scope of who you are doing training with, and what sorts of things you're teaching?

Dr. Sue Green: Okay. So we run two days, and the first day is open to any professional working with people who might be homeless. So there might be a chaplain in jail. They might be working with the homeless, alcohol and drug services.

And so what we cover in those days is, "What is forced adoption?" Now, we would say that if in 1972, we had 10,000 adoptions, for example, (very similar in the USA)... If those people were supported by family, had access to abortion, child supporting parent payment, job opportunities, et cetera, they would not choose to adopt.

So, when we say we only have 32 across Australia now, we would say that, you know, at least 9,680 adoptions were forced, because they had no choice. Now, within that group, there are mothers who were tied to the bed, drugged, you know, some really awful things happened– falsified consent, all those sorts of things.

So we cover "What does forced adoption mean?" We then talk about the seven core issues of adoption. And we also add mattering and trust, and then we hear about the experiences from mothers, adoptees, fathers, and adoptive parents about what has been the impact of adoption on them. And then we talk a lot about the values and myths around adoption, and getting people to question their own values.

Then we talk a little bit about the role of support groups, because they're fundamental. I mean, there's nothing like sitting with your peers and connecting, and encouraging therapists, community workers to use that as an adjunct. And in fact, some of my training–I've actually had a mother with a therapist come, for the first day.

So, and we also talk about search and support in the legislation, because I have found that most people in the community, whether they're a counselor, or a housing worker, or whatever, don't know about the legislation and how to approach that. And what would you need to do to support someone through search and contact? So they're the sort of things we cover the first day.

Haley Radke: Ok, before you go to day two, I imagine you have people come to this who don't really know what they're getting into. And how wide do people's eyes get when they see those videos of adoptees sharing? Or just the idea that there's a trauma that occurs when a child is separated from a parent? What are those light bulb moments like?

Dr. Sue Green: Oh, look, it's really amazing because you start getting– We have, with face-to-face training, you might have five or six people round a table and one will be an adoptee, one will be someone that's working in adoption (maybe either in search and support or actually arranging adoptions), you'll have some child welfare professionals, you'll have some general therapists…

And what happens, is there's an exchange of information. And often the adoptee, or the mother, or whoever starts sharing their experience, too, because they've seen it on screen, and from the feedback we get is, "I never understood that it was so complex. I'm gonna look at this client in a different way now."

Haley Radke: You can't unsee it, right? Once you know, you know. Yep, yep.

Dr. Sue Green: That's right. And that's the light bulb we want.

Haley Radke: Absolutely. Okay. Sorry to interrupt. Why don't you tell us about day two?

Dr. Sue Green: Oh, okay. So if you're a counselor, you need to come to day one as well as day two, to understand the context, and just get all that sharing with others.

On day two, we talk about theories of adoption. And so we talk about genetic and goodness-of-fit theories, social wealth theory, narrative coherence theory, trauma theory, attachment theory, stress and coping theories–all the theories that are around. And we get people to quite thoroughly look at trauma theory in relation to that.

And then, we talk about when an individual comes to you, "How do you determine what is adoption related and not adoption related, particularly when you're talking about adults who might be anything from 30 to 75?" And "I've had a huge amount of life experience. As well as with adoption." And how do those interplay and inform?

So we talk about the five Ps. You know, what are the presenting issues? And we very thoroughly talk about the difference between loss, and grief, and trauma, and how to assess that using the DSM-5. We talk about what precipitated what was now, "Why now?" "Is it the birth of a child? Is it you've just learnt you're adopted? Why are you coming to therapy now?"

We talk about the predisposing things. For example, "What do you know about your adoption? Was it open in the family? Closed in the family? Were you in an orphanage? Were you–how were you parented? How did you deal with the age you were told? What were you told? What were your fantasies?"

All that big picture that you need to know about a person. We talk about what are some of the perpetuating things that might be–feeling of shame, not having connection with anyone else with the experience, all those things. It might be a sudden outreach from a parent to you. Because in Victoria, parents can also get identifying information; it's not only adoptees.

Or DNA is a very common thing. And then, "What are all the protective factors for that person?," you know, if they've got supportive relationships, those sort of things. So we talk about the whole picture, and then we take some case examples and people have to sit down and discuss them. And, "How would they work with that person? What questions would they want to ask?" And you know, I've got now case feedback from a couple hundred people, just discussing this stuff. And then, we talk about search and contact, and someone's ready. "So what would you need to consider in relation to that? How would you equip and support a person?"

And then we also specifically, as I said, talk about late discovery adoptees (you know, you could do a whole day on that). In our Australian research, there's no definition of that. They use 12 in the Institute of Family Studies, but you know, we've had people, I think up to 80, discover they're adopted.

And what does that do to you when you've left that identity? And we also talk about genetic sexual attraction, which doesn't need to be sexual, per se. But you know, me not talking to my mother, was that overpowering sense of connection. Or we have a mother who talks about her son walking towards her that she hasn't met in 30 years in bike gear, and she's got pin pricks all over her body as he comes, because she just knows.

And you know that enormous– It doesn't happen for everybody, but people need to be equipped by the overwhelming domination of this event in your life, and giving that space. And I think that's something we also talk about, the level of awareness. You may (and I still see today), some people who are adopted and they have no awareness that….I think you'd be calling it still in the fog. There's no awareness that this might be related to whatever's happening in your life. And then you have emerging awareness, and then you have some people who are drowning in awareness, and adoption is everything. And then you have all the people that are in different stages of reconstructing, and integrating, and accepting loss.

And so it's very important to be aware of where people are at, also. So, you know, that's a really big complex picture to cover, but it gives people a taste, and it gets professionals talking about all this with one another

Haley Radke: Which–it's so necessary. I don't know how many times we've talked about this on the show already, but, you know, you mentioned this at the top… You can, you know, become a psychologist, and literally never have adoption addressed in any of your classes.

Dr. Sue Green: Yep. And one thing, you know, what are you going to go away with? Well, we want, on the referral form, a question: "Have you had an experience related to adoption?"

And now we need to do that with all the genetic donation stuff. We need to have that on our intake. You know, I went to the doctor's last week and the surgery has moved, and I had to fill in a new form. There was still nothing about adoption or, you know, genetic carriage on the intake form.

Now that is just crazy to me. And then how do you sensitively ask the question? You know? So just, "Can you tell me about your family?" You know, "Have there been significant losses in your life?" That you keep it very broad, because you never know what you might be unpacking, and where people are. And one pleasing thing is, we've had a whole lot of people from the aged care sector come to the day one training and VANISH has been also organizing separate seminars. You know, adoption’s been seen as a special group in aged care and as people go towards the end of their life stage and they're reflecting on life, that is a really important time of life. Because you know these issues could emerge at any time.

Haley Radke: Thank you for sharing that. Okay. Is there anything I didn't ask you about, Sue, that you really wanna make sure you tell us before we go on to our resources?

Dr. Sue Green: Oh, look, I'll just say your program's wonderful. Because what I still think we don't acknowledge is adopted children grow up to be adults, and we have our own needs that are totally unrecognized.

And you know, I went to the case training again, the National Training Initiative, and it's like you can work with these adoptive families and deal with their mental health issues. And I would say, “No, you can't, because we still have those throughout our life.” And it's actually the whole narrative and process of adoption that is the issue.

The falsification of the birth certificate, it's not allowing the authenticity of the person to grow, you know, from very young childhood, for having to fit in. All those sorts of things, really important to acknowledge. And so we just don't recognize all the needs that we have as adults: when we have our first child, and become grandparents, when we're dealing with relationships, we're dealing with families, the divided loyalty issues. We just do not acknowledge that. And so, you know, I'm really grateful that you publicized, so some audience might hear.

Haley Radke: Thank you. I appreciate that. Okay, so we are gonna do our recommended resources, and mine is something that Sue mentioned earlier on. You referred to it several times, VANISH, which is the Victorian Adoption Network for Information and Self-Help.

So that's a great acronym. I mean, whew!, you got all the letters in there. So, Sue is on the committee, which I'm assuming we might call that being on the board of directors (similar lingo). And if you go to their website, vanish.org.au, oh my word! There are so many resources linked there and you know, some are Australia specific, but there's so many that absolutely apply to adopted people around the world.

No matter what your situation, you can find something there. It's a treasure trove. So, if I'm ever looking for a resource in the future, like if I need, you know, something… (I'm stabbing my fingers.) If I need to come up with something for a recommended resource, cause I don't have anything, maybe I'll come here and look at your resource page.

Yeah, and if you're in Australia (especially in Victoria), make sure you go and check out how you can get involved, get connected, find out more about training through there. And the other thing that's linked on the resource page is your recommended resource. So why don't you go ahead and tell us about that, please?

Dr. Sue Green:Yes, I've recommended… I mean, every state government has made an apology, but I've recommended the YouTube clip of the National Apology, which was delivered by Julia Gillard, who was our first Australian Prime Minister, in March, 2013. So we've now had our sixth anniversary, and you will see people from around Australia in the large hall of Parliament House.

And there's a five minute version, and a 20 minute version. But what was so impressive is she met people, and she talked to them, and she really understood. And if I have time, I can just read out a sentence or two that applies to adoptees.

She said, "To each of you that were adopted or removed, who were led to believe your mother had rejected you, and who were denied the opportunity to grow up with your family and community of origin, and to connect with your culture. We say sorry. We apologize to the sons and daughters who grew up not knowing how much you were wanted and loved. We acknowledge that many of you still experience a constant struggle with identity, uncertainty, and loss. And feel a persistent tension between loyalty to one family and yearning from another."

So it was a very moving day.

Haley Radke: I may have cried just watching the video of that apology. I mean, really! Especially those lines that you read, they're so– It's so significant, right? Having your loss and grief acknowledged, amazingly, is somehow validating, and it's a part of our healing.

Thank you. Thank you so much for sharing your expertise with us and, oh my word!, you have got to get Dr. Green over to teach your therapist, your psychologist, your social workers about how to be adoptee and adoption-competent. Dr. Green, if people want to connect with you and figure out how to bring you over to North America, which is where most of our listeners are, or wherever, right?

You're a world traveler. You get around. Where can we connect with you to find out more about training?

Dr. Sue Green: Well, I would suggest that you contact VANISH via the website. And I have to say, I met some wonderful therapists who are also adoptees in North America that you've also had on your program. And it would be great to just partner up.

Haley Radke: Absolutely. That would be awesome.

Dr. Sue Green: Do some, you know, concurrent work. Yeah. So feel free to contact VANISH.

Haley Radke: So VANISH (the website), again, I'm just gonna repeat it, is vanish.org.au, and there's contact info there. Yeah, and let us know, please, if you have anything coming up, and we will certainly share it on the Facebook page.

You do have a training coming up in a couple weeks (when we're recording this in November). So I will post information about that in the show notes. And people can come and check that out if they're around, or if they want to have an Australian vacation. Thank you so, so much, Sue. It's just been a real honor. Thank you so much for your time today.

Dr. Sue Green: Oh, thank you, Haley. It's been a pleasure talking to you. Bye-bye.

Haley Radke: Oh, my word. I could have interviewed Sue for like five hours. I hope that we can have her back to address some more of this in depth. I mean, we could do… I was joking around with her before we started. I was like, "You could do like a 10-episode series with your level of expertise." So grateful for her time in sharing with us.

I want to say another big thank you to my monthly partners on Patreon. Thank you so much. You guys are literally helping the show to continue, and so I'm so grateful for your ongoing support. If you want to stand with these really amazing people and say, "Yes, I think Adoptees On is valuable, and I want it to continue,” go to adopteeson.com/partner, and you can find out more details there about your bonuses.

And it's been really special. I've gotten to know so many of these supporters as friends in the Facebook group, and some people have Skyped with me, and that's been really fun, too. So there's lots of fun bonuses over on Patreon. Adopteeson.com/partner has details for that. Another amazing way to support the podcast for $0, is just to share an episode with a friend that you know is also adopted.

Maybe there's a specific one that you know would really connect with them. Maybe you know an Australian adoptee, and they would really love to hear Sue's story and get connected with local adoptees in their area. So that is another awesome way to share Adoptees On–with other people just like us that need adoptee support.

Thanks so much for listening. Let's talk again next Friday.